[sniffer] Sniffer 3.0 Installed

2008-10-04 Thread Andy Schmidt
Hi, Didn't realize I had been uninstalled for a few months. I saw that V3 was released, so I gave it a shot. I unzipped the installation files to a new /SNF folder. All files were expanded into the same folder (your zip file had not subfolders!). Following the instructions I

[sniffer] Re: Sniffer 3.0 Installed

2008-10-04 Thread Pete McNeil
Hello Andy, First, let me say thanks for sharing all of this. We don't often get detailed feedback on these things. Your valuable insights will be used to make later releases better. With that said I will add a few comments here and there to explain why things are the way they are and help

[sniffer] Re: Sniffer 3.0 Froze Mail Server

2008-10-04 Thread Andy Schmidt
Ouch - 3.0 didn't even last 12 hours. Imail was frozen up because it apparently couldn't launch any more Sniffer client instances. Event Log was full with: Event Type:Information Event Source:Application Popup Event ID: 26 Description: Application popup:

[sniffer] Re: Sniffer 3.0 Installed

2008-10-04 Thread Pete McNeil
Hello Andy, Saturday, October 4, 2008, 12:28:44 PM, you wrote: HI Pete, Thanks for your feedback. I had to create the UpdateReady.txt file before I was able to test my update script from the command line but I didnt realize that I would be created in the Workspace folder. Without that

[sniffer] Re: Sniffer 3.0 Installed

2008-10-04 Thread Andy Schmidt
Hi Pete, My best thinking at the moment is to perhaps do something like this Right, exactly. As long as the parameters are already there to be modified and the script uses those parameters, then the script is ready to go for any user (with or without distinct directories). Of course doing

[sniffer] Re: FW: [sniffer] Re: Sniffer 3.0 Froze Mail Server

2008-10-04 Thread Andy Schmidt
Hi Pete, Well, I eliminated WeightGate for the time being, just to do my due diligence. Also, since there is a fix sized buffer, I assume actually LOWERING the 3rd number (the allocation for each non-interactive process) would allow for MORE parallel processes to run (as long as the value is

[sniffer] Re: FW: [sniffer] Re: Sniffer 3.0 Froze Mail Server

2008-10-04 Thread Pete McNeil
Hello Andy, Saturday, October 4, 2008, 10:21:31 PM, you wrote: Hi Pete, Well, I eliminated WeightGate for the time being, just to do my due diligence. Also, since there is a fix sized buffer, I assume actually LOWERING the 3rdnumber (the allocation for each non-interactive process)