[sniffer] Re: Volume

Pete posted a link via twitter that there is a bot that is changing addresses every 20 minutes and sending out large volumes of spam. I haven't seen it in my own stats yet. J - Shaun From: Message Sniffer Community [mailto:sniffer@sortmonster.com] On Behalf Of Peer-to-Peer (Sp

RE: [sniffer] Running sniffer as a service

Hello TT, Thanks - this looks to we working well. 5 minutes to setup - can't beat that. Shaun -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ben Emmons Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2006 4:55 PM To: sniffer@SortMonster.com Subject: [sniffer] Running sniffe

Re: [sniffer]Sniffer updates down?

Connecting to www.sortmonster.net[207.97.229.114]:80... connected. As of 1 minute ago. Shaun Sturby, MCSE Manager - Technical Services Optrics Engineering - Solution Partners & Network Specialists Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Website: www.Optrics.com United States: 1740 S 300 West

[sniffer] Re: high spam

Yeah - we noticed that the volume has increased by 200 to 300% over the weekend and is still continuing.   Shaun SturbyTechnical Services Manager[EMAIL PROTECTED] - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Optrics Engineering | www.Optrics.com Canada: 

[sniffer] Re: Is this working?

Pong Shaun Sturby Technical Services Manager - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Optrics Engineering | www.Optrics.com Canada: 6810 - 104 Street, Edmonton, AB, T6H 2L6 TF: 877-463-7638Fax: 780-432-5630 USA: 1740 S 300 West #10, Clearfield, UT, 84015 TF: 877-386-3763Fax: 801

RE: [sniffer] Automatic update snafu

? Shaun Sturby, MCSE Manager - Technical Services Optrics Engineering -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of John Shacklett Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2004 7:33 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [sniffer] Automatic update snafu I'm usi

RE: [sniffer] Automatic update snafu

interupt it with a CONT-C and reduce the load on the server. Shaun Sturby, MCSE Manager - Technical Services Optrics Engineering -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of John Shacklett Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2004 8:50 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject

[sniffer] RuleBase size

Just wanted to chime in here that the original changes seem to have helped my rulebase as it has gone down from 11,355,504 bytes to 4,871,976 bytes but I believe I'm still at the 'standard' rulebase strength. Shaun Sturby, MCSE Manager - Technical Services Optrics Enginee

[sniffer] The next round in the SPAM war?

following URL. http://news.com.com/Experts+Zombie+trick+set+to+send+spam+sky-high/2100-7349 _3-5560664.html?tag=nefd.top Shaun Sturby, MCSE Manager - Technical Services Optrics Engineering - Solution Partners & Network Specialists Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Website: www.Optrics.com United

RE: [sniffer] Rule Strength Analysis Upgrades

Hello Pete, I'm noticing the results of this already. Our rule base went from aprox 70,000 rules to 53,000. I don't see much change in capture rate but it is still early. Shaun -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Pete McNeil Sent: Wednesday, N