Agreed, I was looking into how the milter could work, yet wanting to
catch the spam, so this was just to see what it can do.
So that was not meant to be a permanent setup.
Agreed the effort for me to customize a milter is not appropriate for my
needs.
Good advice about considering postfix doi
On 2015-09-08 04:04, P Pruett wrote:
>
> Interesting, yes, the spamassassin SNF4SA does seem to be able to use
> snf-milter instead of snf-server.
That's probably not a good way to go. This will cause each message to be
scanned twice. Once by the milter and again by the engine via SNF4SA.
If you
Interesting, yes, the spamassassin SNF4SA does seem to be able to use
snf-milter instead of snf-server.
On freebsd 9.3 with Sendmail, I did add the milter and restarted sendmail
and its seems to be playing okay.
Now I turned it on, I am not sure what the snf milter is doing.
Can you point me t
On 2015-09-06 13:11, P Pruett wrote:
> So what "gotchas" do you know that I need to be aware of if I already
> have snf-server
> setup and I am going to try snf-milter?
The two are not designed to work together.
It turns out that SNFMilter has the full SNF engine in it so if you have
SNFMilter ru
