On Tuesday, June 17, 2014 11:19:04 AM Sajini De Silva wrote:
Hi,
Does anyone knows the $Subject.
Thank you.
How about RFC-2790? Go look at it at www.mibdebot.com in the
http://www.mibdepot.com/cgi-bin/vendor_index.cgi?r=ietf_rfcs list.
There isn't an OID with the processor count but
Maybe I should add:
If a managedobject without context(null) will be unregistered the result of the
comperator is:
public int compare(MOScope o1, MOScope o2) {
if (o1==o2) {
return 0; // ensure identity is equal
}..
Because the instance of the scope is the same (mo.getscope()).
I checked the distributions in tar.bz2, tar.gz and zip formats of the
versions in the subject [1][2] and all of them don't match the provided
SHA1 sums.
I could not check if this has been already reported as the list archive
[3] is not accessible (404, linked from here [4]). Also, the link to
Hi,
The 1.x releases have indeed a wrong hash value due to a bug in the then
used Maven 2 which calculated the hash as hash(file+file) instead of
hash(file).
The confluence and jira pages have been restored (wrong webserver config).
I am still working on the fix for the mailman and pipermail
Hi,
The links are all working (again) now.
Best regards,
Frank
Am 17.06.2014 17:56, schrieb Frank Fock:
Hi,
The 1.x releases have indeed a wrong hash value due to a bug in the then
used Maven 2 which calculated the hash as hash(file+file) instead of
hash(file).
The confluence and jira pages
