Re: [SNMP4J] Issue when a PDU contains two SETs for a table row status with a value of 6 to destroy when one row exists and the other row does not exist

Hi Don, This is obviously a bug and will be fixed with the next SNMP4J-Agent release. Best regards, Frank > On 9. Aug 2017, at 16:54, Broderick, Don wrote: > > SNMP4J version 2.5.6 > SNMP4J-Agent version 2.6.0 > > I have discovered the following behavior inconsistency where

[SNMP4J] Issue when a PDU contains two SETs for a table row status with a value of 6 to destroy when one row exists and the other row does not exist

SNMP4J version 2.5.6 SNMP4J-Agent version 2.6.0 I have discovered the following behavior inconsistency where I would expect no error to be returned in both cases. When a PDU is sent containing one SET of a row status to 6 for destroy for a row that exists the row is destroyed and no error is