Re: [SNMP4J] Question about receiving SNMPv3 traps

2019-01-07 Thread Girish Venkatasubramanian
Hi Frank. Thanks for the reply. One further request for clarification inlined ... Thanks Girish On Mon, Jan 7, 2019, 5:24 PM Frank Fock Hello Girish, > > You can use approach (1) with autoDiscoveryEnabled. > You mean enabled on the trap sender or receiver or both? I assume you mean trap sender

Re: [SNMP4J] Question about receiving SNMPv3 traps

2019-01-07 Thread Frank Fock
Hello Girish, You can use approach (1) with autoDiscoveryEnabled. if it is not enabled, you will have to use approach (2). Having a different user ID (you mean securityName) for each trap sender won’t help, because the SNMPv3 USM lookup uses the engineID anyway. Best regards, Frank > On 7.

Re: [SNMP4J] help: multiple context

2019-01-07 Thread Liu, Yu M. (NSB - CN/Beijing)
Thanks for the info. Best Regards, Liu Yu Tel: +86 10 64798176 (2736 8176) Email : yu.m@nokia-sbell.com -Original Message- From: Frank Fock [mailto:f...@agentpp.com] Sent: 2019年1月7日 16:19 To: Liu, Yu M. (NSB - CN/Beijing) Cc: snmp4j@agentpp.org Subject: Re: [SNMP4J] help: multiple

Re: [SNMP4J] help: multiple context

2019-01-07 Thread Frank Fock
Hi Yu, That is intended behavior. The SNMP4J-Agent default context (empty context name) is visible in all SNMPv3 contexts although the explicit context takes precedence if there are registrations for the same OID in requested context and the default context. If you want strict separation, you