[SNMP4J] SNMPv3 Notifications

2017-02-02 Thread Ronald Braswell
I have a device that hard codes a UsmUser name nameB and sends it with
SNMPv3 notifications noAuthNoPriv (can't change the level).  I did
configure the device for SNMPv3 with a different user name nameA and the
passphrases for priv and auth.   I can poll the device using nameA.   But I
cannot send a notification from the device using SNMPv3. which uses nameB.
  Is this because with SNMPv3 notifications there must be a UsmUser for
nameB registered in the USM UsmUserTable associated with the snmp instance
(I have one instance for traps and polls)?   Of course I can send a V1 trap
using a trap community string of anything and it is delivered.   But the
SNMP4J library will not deliver the SNMPv3 notification with  nameB to
processPdu(CommandResponderEvent evt).

I configured the SNMP manager (my code) with nameB using the same authPriv
as for nameA and set up the same user on the target device with the same
security parameters.  Now when the device sends an SNMPv3 notification USM,
name=nameB, noAuthNoPriv the SNMP4J software forwards the notification to
me whereas it did not before.

Do I need to add a nameB UsmUser noAuthNoPriv to the UsmUserTable just to
receive SNMPv3 traps from the device which hard codes the nameB for the
UsmUser name?

Ron
___
SNMP4J mailing list
SNMP4J@agentpp.org
https://oosnmp.net/mailman/listinfo/snmp4j


[SNMP4J] Set USM security parameters per request

2017-02-01 Thread Ronald Braswell
I have code which calls USM.removeEngineTime(engineID) that I use to enable
the re-discovery process again for a device with which my SNMP manager has
lost communications.   This works for several devices.   But one device has
problems.

If I call USM.removeEngineTime(engineID) for this device before it comes
back up, when it does come back up the requests go out with a reboots
parameter of 0 but with a time parameter > 0 indicating the time since the
call to removeEngineTime.   The device does not respond to this.  If I do
another removeEngineTime after the device comes back up the time security
parameter is 0 as well as the reboots parameter and it works.   The problem
is that I don't know when the device comes back up since it does not send a
trap or notification indicating this.   When I call my function
(resetUsmUser(securityName))  it resets all TimeTableEntries with
securityName even if the entry is not the localized one for the device
having the problem.   I have a number of like devices using the same USM
security name and passphrases.   I would prefer the ones still up not have
to go through the discovery process as well.I would like to be able to
set the reboots, time for the request to 0 just for a particular request
going to the particular device.

Is there a way to do this with SNMP4J?Is there a away in the SNMP4J API
to tell which localized UserTableEntry belongs to a particular device (USM
discovery process enabled)?

Ron
___
SNMP4J mailing list
SNMP4J@agentpp.org
https://oosnmp.net/mailman/listinfo/snmp4j


[SNMP4J] Issue using AES 192

2016-12-20 Thread Ronald Braswell
I have successfully configured a USM user on a Cisco 2960-XR device with
'auth SHA KEY' and 'priv AES 128 KEY'.  (the KEY is a placeholder in this
email to represent the pass phrase) This works fine.

However, when I use 'auth SHA KEY' and 'priv AES 192 KEY'  I get the
following error:

1.  In onResponse(ResponseEvent evt):

 evt.getError() ->  Exception:   'Message processing model 3 returned
error:  Encryption error'

 This is due to the report response from the target device to a
get-request from the manager.

I am attaching a file from a Wireshark export showing two instances of this
behavior.   Note that after the initial get-request and report response,
each invocation of snmp.send() simply returns the 'Message processing model
3 returned error: Encryption error'  without sending a new get-request.

I suspect that this is an issue with the target device with AES 192 and AES
256.   But I am wondering if there might be something that I might try on
the manager side.

Ron
___
SNMP4J mailing list
SNMP4J@agentpp.org
https://oosnmp.net/mailman/listinfo/snmp4j


[SNMP4J] snmp4j-smi-pro issue

2016-11-03 Thread Ronald Braswell
I am trying to use the SmiModule::getImports() to get the imports for a
module.

Then I want to use the SmiImport::getImportedObjectNames() and
SmiImport::getSourceModuleName()
methods for each import.

Here is the import clause for XUPS-MIB:

IMPORTS
TimeTicks, Gauge32, Counter32, Integer32
FROM SNMPv2-SMI
DisplayString
FROM SNMPv2-TC
MODULE-IDENTITY, OBJECT-TYPE, NOTIFICATION-TYPE
FROM SNMPv2-SMI
MODULE-COMPLIANCE, OBJECT-GROUP, NOTIFICATION-GROUP
FROM SNMPv2-CONF
eaton, xupsEnvironment
FROM EATON-OIDS
-- Need to import these EMP objects to support PowerMIB-style traps for
EMP
xupsContactIndex, xupsContactType, xupsContactState, xupsContactDescr,
xupsEnvRemoteTemp, xupsEnvRemoteTempLowerLimit,
xupsEnvRemoteTempUpperLimit,
xupsEnvRemoteHumidity, xupsEnvRemoteHumidityLowerLimit,
xupsEnvRemoteHumidityUpperLimit
FROM EATON-EMP-MIB;

Issues:

   The source module names I get from this module are:

   RFC1155-SMI
   RFC1213-MIB
   RFC-1212
   RFC-1215

   List  moduleImports = smiModule.getImports();
   List  importedModules = moduleImports.stream().map( i ->
i.getSourceModuleName() ).collect(Collectors.toList());
   importedModules.stream().forEach(System.out::println);

Am I doing something wrong?

Yet, smiModule.getObjectNames() does include the objects imported from the
EATON-EMP-OID (e.g.  xupsEnvRemoteTemp) but the imported objects do not
have all fields populated (e.g. units) whereas the EATON-EMP-MIB objects do
have all fields populated (according to the MIB.

Why would I not see EATON-EMP-MIB in the list of SmiImport for the XUPS-MIB
module?

Ron
___
SNMP4J mailing list
SNMP4J@agentpp.org
https://oosnmp.net/mailman/listinfo/snmp4j


[SNMP4J] SNMP4j-SMI-PRO Question

2016-10-11 Thread Ronald Braswell
I want to find out how many components (sub-identifiers) comprise an index
some some OID.   This info is in the table entry.   However, if the table
entry augments another table, the indexes are not given but the table entry
which is being augmented is available in the augments clause in the table
entry that augments it.   An example would be the ifXEntry augments ifEntry.

In snmp4j-smi-pro,  I don't see anything in SmiObjectType or SmiObject that
yields the augmented table.   Did I overlook this?

I want to find out given an arbitrary OID that may be included in a trap
how many sub-identifiers make up the prefix.   If the last sub-identifier
is not 0, then I guess I could remove the last until I get to a type of
OBJECT_TYPE_COLUMN.

But is this the best way?

Ron
___
SNMP4J mailing list
SNMP4J@agentpp.org
https://oosnmp.net/mailman/listinfo/snmp4j


[SNMP4J] Using localized keys

2016-10-09 Thread Ronald Braswell
Hi,

I have read about localized keys and understand the concept.   I don't yet
understand how to implement them and use them with SNMP4J.

If anyone has the time to briefly share how to do this I would greatly
appreciate it.

Ron
___
SNMP4J mailing list
SNMP4J@agentpp.org
https://oosnmp.net/mailman/listinfo/snmp4j


[SNMP4J] TreeUtils & DefaultPDUFactory

2016-10-05 Thread Ronald Braswell
I am attempting to use TreeUtils with a DefaultPDUFactory using GETNEXT
(the OID range is small).

I have set engine discovery for USM during the initialization of the
program to true.

The target uses V3 and USM. I have successfully polled the target and
have successfully received traps from the target without specifying the
engineID when adding the UsmUser.

However, when I use TreeUtils as described above, it fails with 'Context
engine ID must not be null' at org.snmp4j.ScopedPDU.setContextEngineID()
line 69.

I am using SNMP4j version 2.5.

I notice using wireshark that a get-request is sent to the device to elicit
the report PDU from which it can discover the authoritative engine ID.
There are two packets sent from the manager to the target and the target
responds to each.   I would assume that the packets are encrypted getnext
packets with the responses appropriate to the requests.

When using the DefaultPDUFactory, do I need to specify the authoritative
engine for the user when adding the user to USM even though when polling
and I specify the PDU this is not necessary?

Ron
___
SNMP4J mailing list
SNMP4J@agentpp.org
https://oosnmp.net/mailman/listinfo/snmp4j


[SNMP4J] snmp4j-smi-pro thread safe?

2016-10-02 Thread Ronald Braswell
Are methods on the SmiManager such as 'SmiObject findSmiObject(OID)' for
snmp4j-smi-pro 1.8 thread safe?

Ron
___
SNMP4J mailing list
SNMP4J@agentpp.org
https://oosnmp.net/mailman/listinfo/snmp4j


Re: [SNMP4J] Trap Handling Configuration Framework

2016-09-30 Thread Ronald Braswell
Thank you.

Ron

On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 3:50 PM, Fabrice Bacchella <
fabrice.bacche...@orange.fr> wrote:

> I have written two product:
>
> The first, https://github.com/fbacchella/SmiExtensions integrate in
> snmp4j and can help resolve OID, it still in early stage.
>
> The second, https://github.com/fbacchella/LogHub, can listen for snmp
> trap using snmp4j and transform them in java map to be processed.
>
>
> > Le 29 sept. 2016 à 20:32, Frank Fock <f...@agentpp.com> a écrit :
> >
> >
> > Hi Ron,
> >
> > There are several existing (mostly commercial) trap receiver
> implementations.
> > One that uses SNMP4J as protocol implementation is TrapStation.
> > All of them provide generic approaches to classify and correlate traps.
> >
> > My MIB Explorer can do this too on a basic level.
> >
> > A fully generic approach will fail for many MIBs in the market. You will
> need
> > some scripting to achieve best integration result for those non-standard
> MIBs.
> >
> > Hope this helps anyway.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Frank
> >
> >
> >> On 29 Sep 2016, at 02:57, Ronald Braswell <rpbrasw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Is there a configuration based framework for which configurations can be
> >> specified to properly evaluate all traps from all vendors (or close to
> it)?
> >>
> >> If not, do most people write custom code to handle traps from various
> >> vendors?
> >>
> >> Ron
> >> ___
> >> SNMP4J mailing list
> >> SNMP4J@agentpp.org
> >> https://oosnmp.net/mailman/listinfo/snmp4j
> >
> > ___
> > SNMP4J mailing list
> > SNMP4J@agentpp.org
> > https://oosnmp.net/mailman/listinfo/snmp4j
>
>
___
SNMP4J mailing list
SNMP4J@agentpp.org
https://oosnmp.net/mailman/listinfo/snmp4j


[SNMP4J] Trap Handling Configuration Framework

2016-09-28 Thread Ronald Braswell
Is there a configuration based framework for which configurations can be
specified to properly evaluate all traps from all vendors (or close to it)?

If not, do most people write custom code to handle traps from various
vendors?

Ron
___
SNMP4J mailing list
SNMP4J@agentpp.org
https://oosnmp.net/mailman/listinfo/snmp4j


[SNMP4J] Snmp Instances

2016-09-22 Thread Ronald Braswell
Should I use an instance of Snmp for traps and one for polls each with one
transport mapping or would it be better to use one instance of Snmp with
two transport mappings -- one for port 161 and one for port 162?

Ron
___
SNMP4J mailing list
SNMP4J@agentpp.org
https://oosnmp.net/mailman/listinfo/snmp4j


[SNMP4J] Can't compile RFC1155-SMI

2016-08-17 Thread Ronald Braswell
I downloaded RFC1155-SMI and tried to load it with the SmiManager for
SNMP4J-SMI-PRO 1.8.0.

It failed with:Syntax error:  Encountered "EXPORTS internet" at line 3.


The reason why I am loading this is because RFC1155-SMI is an import for
powernet412.mib which I am having difficulty compiling due to Integer32 and
Unsigned32 not being defined.


Ron
___
SNMP4J mailing list
SNMP4J@agentpp.org
https://oosnmp.net/mailman/listinfo/snmp4j


[SNMP4J] D-TLS Transport Mapping

2016-01-30 Thread Ronald Braswell
Hi,

Has anyone provided a D-TLS Transport Mapping?

Ron
___
SNMP4J mailing list
SNMP4J@agentpp.org
https://oosnmp.net/mailman/listinfo/snmp4j