Re: [SNMP4J] Trap Handling Configuration Framework

[Ronald Braswell]

Thank you.

Ron

On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 3:50 PM, Fabrice Bacchella <
fabrice.bacche...@orange.fr> wrote:

> I have written two product:
>
> The first, https://github.com/fbacchella/SmiExtensions integrate in
> snmp4j and can help resolve OID, it still in early stage.
>
> The second, https://github.com/fbacchella/LogHub, can listen for snmp
> trap using snmp4j and transform them in java map to be processed.
>
>
> > Le 29 sept. 2016 à 20:32, Frank Fock  a écrit :
> >
> >
> > Hi Ron,
> >
> > There are several existing (mostly commercial) trap receiver
> implementations.
> > One that uses SNMP4J as protocol implementation is TrapStation.
> > All of them provide generic approaches to classify and correlate traps.
> >
> > My MIB Explorer can do this too on a basic level.
> >
> > A fully generic approach will fail for many MIBs in the market. You will
> need
> > some scripting to achieve best integration result for those non-standard
> MIBs.
> >
> > Hope this helps anyway.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Frank
> >
> >
> >> On 29 Sep 2016, at 02:57, Ronald Braswell  wrote:
> >>
> >> Is there a configuration based framework for which configurations can be
> >> specified to properly evaluate all traps from all vendors (or close to
> it)?
> >>
> >> If not, do most people write custom code to handle traps from various
> >> vendors?
> >>
> >> Ron
> >> ___
> >> SNMP4J mailing list
> >> SNMP4J@agentpp.org
> >> https://oosnmp.net/mailman/listinfo/snmp4j
> >
> > ___
> > SNMP4J mailing list
> > SNMP4J@agentpp.org
> > https://oosnmp.net/mailman/listinfo/snmp4j
>
>
___
SNMP4J mailing list
SNMP4J@agentpp.org
https://oosnmp.net/mailman/listinfo/snmp4j

Re: [SNMP4J] Trap Handling Configuration Framework

[Frank Fock]

Hi Ron,

There are several existing (mostly commercial) trap receiver implementations.
One that uses SNMP4J as protocol implementation is TrapStation. 
All of them provide generic approaches to classify and correlate traps.

My MIB Explorer can do this too on a basic level. 

A fully generic approach will fail for many MIBs in the market. You will need 
some scripting to achieve best integration result for those non-standard MIBs.

Hope this helps anyway.

Best regards,
Frank 


> On 29 Sep 2016, at 02:57, Ronald Braswell  wrote:
> 
> Is there a configuration based framework for which configurations can be
> specified to properly evaluate all traps from all vendors (or close to it)?
> 
> If not, do most people write custom code to handle traps from various
> vendors?
> 
> Ron
> ___
> SNMP4J mailing list
> SNMP4J@agentpp.org
> https://oosnmp.net/mailman/listinfo/snmp4j

___
SNMP4J mailing list
SNMP4J@agentpp.org
https://oosnmp.net/mailman/listinfo/snmp4j

[SNMP4J] Trap Handling Configuration Framework

[Ronald Braswell]

Is there a configuration based framework for which configurations can be
specified to properly evaluate all traps from all vendors (or close to it)?

If not, do most people write custom code to handle traps from various
vendors?

Ron
___
SNMP4J mailing list
SNMP4J@agentpp.org
https://oosnmp.net/mailman/listinfo/snmp4j