[SNMP4J] Possible concurrency bug in snmp4j ?

2018-02-12 Thread Maayan, Elhanan
Hi..i'm using snm4j 2.4.3. Is it possible that just when snmp4j closes a connection (due to timeout, or remote closing) and it's trying to addRegistration causing to throw an exception, is it possible that snmp4j can no longer establish connection? Below is a small log of a sample client I'm

Re: [SNMP4J] Possible concurrency bug in snmp4j ?

2018-02-12 Thread Maayan, Elhanan
, February 12, 2018 8:45 PM To: Maayan, Elhanan <elhanan.maa...@sbdinc.com> Cc: snmp4j@agentpp.org Subject: Re: [SNMP4J] Possible concurrency bug in snmp4j ? *External Message, please be cautious.* Hi Elhanan, Please upgrade to SNMP4J 2.5.11 to fix this issue. Best regards Frank >

Re: [SNMP4J] Possible concurrency bug in snmp4j ?

2018-02-13 Thread Maayan, Elhanan
so 2.5.11 won't help? Any workaround? Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36> From: Frank Fock <f...@agentpp.com> Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2018 11:51:23 AM To: Maayan, Elhanan Cc: snmp4j@agentpp.org Subject: Re: [SNMP4J] Possible con

Re: [SNMP4J] Possible concurrency bug in snmp4j ?

2018-02-14 Thread Maayan, Elhanan
Thanks, do you have any timeline regarding 2.6? From: Frank Fock [mailto:f...@agentpp.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2018 7:15 PM To: Maayan, Elhanan <elhanan.maa...@sbdinc.com> Cc: snmp4j@agentpp.org Subject: Re: [SNMP4J] Possible concurrency bug in snmp4j ? *External Message,

Re: [SNMP4J] Possible concurrency bug in snmp4j ?

2018-02-23 Thread Maayan, Elhanan
Hi, Is there a delay in release? I' rather not try the dev snapshot if possible.. Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36> From: Frank Fock <f...@agentpp.com> Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2018 11:08:37 AM To: Maayan, Elhanan Cc: snmp4j@agentpp

Re: [SNMP4J] Java9+ required now?

2018-10-03 Thread Maayan, Elhanan
: Fabrice Bacchella Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2018 10:10 AM To: Maayan, Elhanan Cc: Frank Fock ; Jeremy Norris ; snmp4j@agentpp.org Subject: Re: [SNMP4J] Java9+ required now? *External Message, please be cautious.* > 3. java 9 itself is considered broken, eol, and on top of that migrat

Re: [SNMP4J] Java9+ required now?

2018-10-04 Thread Maayan, Elhanan
But snmp4jv3 is still snmp?, we are using a custom binary protocol allready on place with vendors? Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36> From: Frank Fock Sent: Thursday, October 4, 03:09 Subject: Re: [SNMP4J] Java9+ required now? To: Maayan, Elhanan Cc: Jeremy Norris,