+1
- Original Message -
From: "Matthew J. Duftler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "soap-dev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2001 4:07 PM
Subject: VOTE: Release v2.2
> Hi All,
>
> Well, I think it's time to vote on releasing v2.2. The only changes from
> v2.2RC3 are the addition of
PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: Re: Release v2.2
+1 overall on the release.
I am (and have been) able to build com/client on a Windows machine without
any problems.
I don't have a preference between classes and lib in the webapp, but I
would rather it be o
l Message-
> From: Doug Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 5:46 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Release v2.2
>
>
> Just a couple of quick comments:
> Glen - remove that sample dir and re-extract it from
>cvs. As
ere in there, we figured this was the way to
cover the most containers, and still be in compliance.
Thanks,
-Matt
> -Original Message-
> From: Glen Daniels [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 12:31 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Release v2.2
Doug Davis writes:
> Sanjiva - if I read your note right you say that the
> source dist isn't buildable, right? why?
> I've never understood that - it seems like
> if I wanted to grab the source I'm gonna
> want to build it - making someone go to cvs
>
PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: Re: Release v2.2
Doug Davis wrote:
>
> Glen - remove that sample dir and re-extract it from
> cvs. As Sanjiva said that _will_ fix it (I had
> the same problem myself a while ago - a bug in
> cvs if you ask me).
>
Glen Daniels wrote:
>
> Here's my take on this. WAR files are all about easy deployment. You
> should not actually be forced to alter classpath settings for your
servlet
> engine just to get a webapp installed and working.
I doubt anybody would disagree with this.
> See above. If we're going
+1 overall on the release.
I am (and have been) able to build com/client on a Windows machine without
any problems.
I don't have a preference between classes and lib in the webapp, but I
would rather it be one or the other.
Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:
>
> If there aren't any problems I urge you
Doug Davis wrote:
>
> Glen - remove that sample dir and re-extract it from
> cvs. As Sanjiva said that _will_ fix it (I had
> the same problem myself a while ago - a bug in
> cvs if you ask me).
>From what I can see, there is no record of the lower case names on the
server. Wh
> The classes are in the WEB-INF/classes directory, which is a completely
> acceptable alternate to putting the jar file. So what's the problem?
Apologies. It was obviously too late for me to be up. You're quite right,
ALL the classes are in there. I'd thought only the samples were being put
Hi Sanjiva:
> > I just did an "ant dist" and got two errors building the samples. Looks
> > like both com/client/addit.java and com/client/sum.java are the wrong
case
> > (files should perhaps be Addit.java and Sum.java to match the class
> names -
> > problem went away for me when I renamed the
lie. Please change it to just
zip-up the cvs tree w/o the CVS dirs.
-Dug
"Sanjiva Weerawarana" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 05/30/2001 04:18:37 AM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject: Re: Release v2.2
Glen Daniels writes:
Glen Daniels writes:
> -1 as is. I'm really sorry to do this at the 11th (12th? :)) hour, but I
> finally actually tried out the dist for real.
I'm rather disappointed that you didn't check out the release
candidates and waited until a vote was called to bring this
up. Nevertheless, problems are
-1 as is. I'm really sorry to do this at the 11th (12th? :)) hour, but I
finally actually tried out the dist for real.
I just did an "ant dist" and got two errors building the samples. Looks
like both com/client/addit.java and com/client/sum.java are the wrong case
(files should perhaps be Addi
14 matches
Mail list logo
