004 10:03 PM
Subject: Memo: RE: HTTP 1.1 Persistent Connection
> Thanks a lot (and also for Scott on the suggestion on NoTcpDelay). I will
> try the setNoTcpDelay first (as it's much simpler) and see if there is any
> help. If situation does not improve, I will try the HTTPClient s
Your Ref:
Subject: RE: HTTP 1.1 Persistent Connection
bk> I knew that Apache SOAP only support HTTP 1.0 and I've searched
bk> through the archive of this maili
bk> I knew that Apache SOAP only support HTTP 1.0 and I've searched
bk> through the archive of this mailing list and don't see anyone
bk> doing HTTP 1.1. Is it very diffcult to do? We are not HTTP expert
bk> but we do want to know if it is possible to do it.
I don't know about the server side, but
, January 20, 2004 2:56 AM
Subject: HTTP 1.1 Persistent Connection
> Hi all,
>
> We are currently facing a performance problem in using Apache SOAP to
> sending a high volume of SOAP messages to a remote server. Our network
> people told us that one of the issue is that there is a l
t; people told us that one of the issue is that there is a lot of TCP
> handshaking and they suggest us to use HTTP 1.1 persistent connection.
>
> I knew that Apache SOAP only support HTTP 1.0 and I've searched through
> the archive of this mailing list and don't see anyone doi
e issue is that there is a lot of TCP
> handshaking and they suggest us to use HTTP 1.1 persistent connection.
>
> I knew that Apache SOAP only support HTTP 1.0 and I've searched through
> the archive of this mailing list and don't see anyone doing HTTP 1.1. Is
> it very diffc
Hi all,
We are currently facing a performance problem in using Apache SOAP to
sending a high volume of SOAP messages to a remote server. Our network
people told us that one of the issue is that there is a lot of TCP
handshaking and they suggest us to use HTTP 1.1 persistent connection.
I knew
