004 10:03 PM
Subject: Memo: RE: HTTP 1.1 Persistent Connection
> Thanks a lot (and also for Scott on the suggestion on NoTcpDelay). I will
> try the setNoTcpDelay first (as it's much simpler) and see if there is any
> help. If situation does not improve, I will try the HTTPClient s
Your Ref:
Subject: RE: HTTP 1.1 Persistent Connection
bk> I knew that Apache SOAP only support HTTP 1.0 and I've searched
bk> through the archive of this maili
bk> I knew that Apache SOAP only support HTTP 1.0 and I've searched
bk> through the archive of this mailing list and don't see anyone
bk> doing HTTP 1.1. Is it very diffcult to do? We are not HTTP expert
bk> but we do want to know if it is possible to do it.
I don't know about the server side, but
Yes, Apache SOAP only does HTTP 1.0. It would be a fair amount of work to support
HTTP 1.1, because of persistent connections, but also chunking and the likes. If it
were not so much work, I would have already done it ;-). Also, I have hesitated
because so many services disable persistent con
Hi Susantha,
It's Java - the code base is Apache SOAP 2.3.1 with some minor code changes (mainly on adding some trace messages).
Billy
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc: Billy T S KAN/TRS IBM APH/HBAP/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Our Ref:
Your Ref:
Subject: R
Hi Billy,
What is the SOAP engine you are using ? Axis ? C++ or Java ?
Thanks,
Susantha.
> Hi all,
>
> We are currently facing a performance problem in using Apache SOAP to
> sending a high volume of SOAP messages to a remote server. Our network
> people told us that one of the issue is that th
