ott Nichol
- Original Message -
From: "Pae Choi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2002 6:44 PM
Subject: Re: binary data in SOAP
> Base64ing makes sense. What about the CDATA section to
> contain the binary data? It says
Base64ing makes sense. What about the CDATA section to
contain the binary data? It says about the "character data",
but the parser should skip the content of the section. I
haven't try that yet though.
Does any try that before? Any comments?
Pae
> You do not send arbitrary binary data as XML
Scott Nichol wrote:
You do not send arbitrary binary data as XML. XML is "readable", i.e.
it is character based. The typical encoding used is utf-8, which would
not allow you to send arbitrary binary data. It is typical to base64
encode binary data, which increases its size 33%. Welcome to XM
You do not send arbitrary binary data as XML. XML is "readable", i.e.
it is character based. The typical encoding used is utf-8, which would
not allow you to send arbitrary binary data. It is typical to base64
encode binary data, which increases its size 33%. Welcome to XML, which
you can gener
