Thanks Anne. Things are a bit axiomatic now. However, what is implied out of this (as well from other readings) is to apply "wait-n-watch" approach until the dust is settled.
Regards,Anne Thomas Manes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
A. SAAJ is a Java standard. Java standards are different from
Thanks Anne. Things are a bit axiomatic now. However, what is implied out of this (as well from other readings) is to apply "wait-n-watch" approach until the dust is settled.
Regards,Anne Thomas Manes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
A. SAAJ is a Java standard. Java standards are different from
Hi,
I'm using WAS 4.03 (Apache SOAP 2.2 ) and didn't see this problem !!
FYI. WAS 4.0.5 & WAS 4.0.6 include Apache SOAP 2.3
You may want to check this out.. http://www-3.ibm.com/software/webservers/appserv/doc/latest/prereq.html
Regards,Michael J Fork <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thank you!
In terms of the attachment model? Perhaps. But a
more pragmatic approach is to either not use attachments (i.e., embed the data
within the SOAP message) or to negotiate with your partner what mechanism to
use. If you're using .NET, you really have only one choice: DIME. Most SOAP
implementat
