> 4061 is correct. > > I had a kit years ago, I also thought it was one of the prettiest fuses I had > seen. Sadly I never got a chance to build it. Seemed like it would be a > real floater. Then again, I had a Prodigy with the same foil, it was a beast. > I believe that the 4061 was a very "peeky" airfoil, meaning that the L/D graph had a rather sharp spike rather than a broad plateau at max L/D. If you got the speed right, the glider flew great; if you were off by only a few mi/hr, the performance was sluggish. If I were cutting a new set of cores for a Quasoar, I'd use a 7036, 7037, or 7038. I'd also reduce the wing span several inches to give better maneuvering ability if flying rudder, elevator (no ailerons). Could be a killer plane in RES. Regards, Bob Johnson Fond du Lac, WI RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
