At 03:54 PM 4/14/2005, you wrote:
I'm seriously considering either an Evo or a 9303 - opinions?
I like the idea of the variable 'digi' mixers on the evo, and also like
the idea of any function to any channel. The synth/scanner function would
be awesome, as would the battery management features.
I've also been looking at getting an evo. I'm not sure that the
Global mixer's are as big an issue as the JR FUD department (Fear
Uncertainty Doubt - a technique perfected to an artform by microsoft)
seem keen to portray. As I understand it the global mixers are
frameworks for establishing how
oaring@airage.com <soaring@airage.com>Date:
Thursday, April 14, 2005 1:55 PMSubject: [RCSE] Evo vs
9303
I'm seriously considering either
an Evo or a 9303 - opinions?
I like the idea of the variable
'digi' mixers on the evo, and also like the idea of any function to
I'm seriously considering either an Evo or a 9303 -
opinions?
I like the idea of the variable 'digi' mixers on
the evo, and also like the idea of any function to any channel. The synth/scanner
function would be awesome, as would the battery management features.
On the down side, I ha
4 matches
Mail list logo
