gldr guy wrote:
>
> >Btw. It doesn't have to be molded to be good and everything molded is not
> >automatically good.
> >
> I think Tom is right here. I believe over the past few years if you look at
> whats doing well in TD, at least out west, you will probably see at lot of non
> molded plane
>Btw. It doesn't have to be molded to be good and everything molded is not
>automatically good.
>
I think Tom is right here. I believe over the past few years if you look at whats
doing well in TD, at least out west, you will probably see at lot of non molded planes
doing quite well. That ma
We were talking about whether a pilot having 18 months of flying
under his belt would be ready for an Ellipse 3CAM. Chances are good
he would. You've been flying for a year and you are ready for an 85oz
molded Eclipse V.
It is a myth...
Dieter
> I agree with Michael Neverdosky. "You need
I agree with Michael Neverdosky. "You need to work your way up in
complexity." I am an example of what he preaches. I have only been flying for
a year now.
I started with a "gas-bag" Paragon. I had thirty or so flights and thermaled
it a few times before blowing it up learning how to
At 01:06 PM 12/11/01, Dieter @ ShredAir wrote:
>I wish to take issue with statements that a pilot with 18-months of flying
>experience cannot handle a good molded sailplane.
this is right on target. High performance competition planes are VERY easy
to fly. it is how they win. if the plane won't
tects
John R. Erickson, AIA
> From: "Dieter @ ShredAir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2001 13:06:50 -0800
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [RCSE] Wind and molded myths
>
>
>
> I wish to take issue with statements that a pilot with 18-months of
&g
I wish to take issue with statements that a pilot with 18-months of
flying experience cannot handle a good molded sailplane. I can only
speak for our line of planes, but they fly more precisely and
consistently and predictably and with overall much better performance
than the crates usually
7 matches
Mail list logo
