TECTED]>
> Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 10:31:37 +1000
> To: Jim Laurel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, D Hauch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc:
> Subject: RE: [RCSE] ballast ? wing/fuse
>
> Hi Jim,
>
> If you do the calculations, or a practical test, you will see that a minor
> er
*
-Original Message-
From: Jim Laurel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 29 June 2005 3:45 PM
To: D Hauch
Cc: soaring@airage.com
Subject: Re: [RCSE] ballast ? wing/fuse
I just don't understand the concept of wing ballast. It would seem
to me that it assumes a particular CG,
, there are structural loading advantages to having
the weight distributed in the wing.
Bill DelHagen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: "D Hauch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Subject: [RCSE] ballast ? wing/fuse
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 23:31:25 -0700
hi all,
you guys where so good on my
I just don't understand the concept of wing ballast. It would seem
to me that it assumes a particular CG, right? If the ballast in the
wing isn't right on the CG, doesn't it mean that the cg actually
changes depending on how much ballast is put in there? Seems a
dubious solution to me.
with the Opus but to a lesser extent. But if there is no
other option, and you need the weight, stuff it in the wing.
--
Greg Smith
Slope Soaring Resource
http://www.slopeflyer.com
> From: D Hauch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 23:31:25 -0700
> To:
> Subje
Original Message-
From: D Hauch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2005 11:31 PM
To: soaring@airage.com
Subject: [RCSE] ballast ? wing/fuse
hi all,
you guys where so good on my last question i have another
for you guys.
some planes take ballast in the fuse and others in the
hi all,
you guys where so good on my last question i have another
for you guys.
some planes take ballast in the fuse and others in the wing.
is there any penalties you pay in performance say for a wing
that is fully ballast, compared to a fuse full.
i'm talking 2lb. to 4lb. of ballast, so the bal
7 matches
Mail list logo
