Re: [SoaS] [IAEP] SoaS Review/Article

2016-05-15 Thread Chris Leonard
On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 1:30 PM, Peter Robinson  wrote:

>> Is there a target date I should be aspiring to hit for poking activity
>> maintainers to make a new release?
>
> Yes, we freeze for Final on May 31st so to ensure they're stable in
> time I would want them by May 24th so we've got a bit over a week, I
> did request updates when I announced Alpha and have had no real
> response.

I'll push (or pull request) some PO files and we'll see if that can
shake out some new releases.

I'll work on this today as much as I can.

cjl
___
SoaS mailing list
SoaS@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/soas


Re: [SoaS] [IAEP] SoaS Review/Article

2016-05-15 Thread Peter Robinson
>>> Could someone following that more closely offer any additional details
>>> and thoughts on possible paths into a easily accessible .108 release?
>>
>> I am one of the Fedora release engineers, you could not get any closer
>> to the process. I would like to
>>
>> I'd like to see updated Activities released but they appear to not
>> happened of late.
>> http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/honey/
>
> Peter, Thanks for the update on SOAS status in F24.  I am much
> comforted knowing that Sugar labs has a champion so close to the heart
> of the process.
>
> I will see what I can do to get some new releases of Activities.  I'm
> the Sugar Labs Translation Community Manager and I've been recovering
> and adding activities to our Pootle instance so I've been developing a
> spreadsheet inventory of ASLO (mostly to track i18n/L10n status).  I
> hope to be landing new or improved PO files to a number of Activities,
> which would be an excellent reason to do a new release.
>
> Is there a target date I should be aspiring to hit for poking activity
> maintainers to make a new release?

Yes, we freeze for Final on May 31st so to ensure they're stable in
time I would want them by May 24th so we've got a bit over a week, I
did request updates when I announced Alpha and have had no real
response.
___
SoaS mailing list
SoaS@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/soas


Re: [SoaS] [IAEP] SoaS Review/Article

2016-05-15 Thread Peter Robinson
On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 3:26 PM, Chris Leonard  wrote:
> I understand that there are currently some concerns about whether SOAS
> will come out with Fedora24 due to errors in the build process (sorry,
> it is not very clear to me)..  It would be a great shame to not make
> the F24 release, but far worse if there was not an eventual path to
> keeping our listing on the spins page with a current release of Sugar.

They will most definitely be there for F-24 GA, and there's the
nightly composes of F-24 where they're there most of the time. The
rel-eng process has been massively overhauled this dev cycle and
there's still a few gremlins lurking.

Nightly F-24 images here from a couple of days ago:

https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/branched/Fedora-24-20160511.n.0/compose/Spins/x86_64/iso/Fedora-SoaS-Live-x86_64-24-20160511.n.0.iso
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/branched/Fedora-24-20160511.n.0/compose/Spins/i386/iso/Fedora-SoaS-Live-i386-24-20160511.n.0.iso
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/branched/Fedora-24-20160511.n.0/compose/Spins/armhfp/images/Fedora-SoaS-armhfp-24-20160511.n.0-sda.raw.xz

> Could someone following that more closely offer any additional details
> and thoughts on possible paths into a easily accessible .108 release?

I am one of the Fedora release engineers, you could not get any closer
to the process. I would like to

I'd like to see updated Activities released but they appear to not
happened of late.
http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/honey/

Peter
___
SoaS mailing list
SoaS@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/soas


Re: [SoaS] [IAEP] SoaS Review/Article

2016-05-15 Thread Peter Robinson
On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 11:53 AM, T.K. Kang  wrote:
> Is there a working image?

There should be.

> Could not find it here ...
> https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/24/latest-Fedora-/compose/Spins/x86_64/iso/

There's been issues with some changes to the compose made late on
Friday so maybe look in the nightly F-24 branched compose at this
link:

https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/branched/

> Can we get the .108 into Fedora 23 ?  BTW the speak and record do not run
> from the new SOAS I made.

Not unless you want to step up and maintain it, I barely have time to
do the new releases.

> Cheers
>
>
> On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 6:04 PM, Peter Robinson 
> wrote:
>>
>> Fedora 24
>>
>> On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 10:41 AM, T.K. Kang  wrote:
>> > Great. It is sugar .106. Would like to use .108 sugar with better
>> > network
>> > connectivity.
>> > Where can we get this build?
>> >
>> > Cheers
>> >
>> > On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 4:33 PM, Peter Robinson 
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> http://www.linuxinsider.com/story/83446.html
>> >> ___
>> >> IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
>> >> i...@lists.sugarlabs.org
>> >> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
>> >
>> >
>
>
___
SoaS mailing list
SoaS@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/soas


Re: [SoaS] [IAEP] SoaS Review/Article

2016-05-15 Thread Chris Leonard
I understand that there are currently some concerns about whether SOAS
will come out with Fedora24 due to errors in the build process (sorry,
it is not very clear to me)..  It would be a great shame to not make
the F24 release, but far worse if there was not an eventual path to
keeping our listing on the spins page with a current release of Sugar.

Could someone following that more closely offer any additional details
and thoughts on possible paths into a easily accessible .108 release?


cjl

On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 6:04 AM, Peter Robinson  wrote:
> Fedora 24
>
> On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 10:41 AM, T.K. Kang  wrote:
>> Great. It is sugar .106. Would like to use .108 sugar with better network
>> connectivity.
>> Where can we get this build?
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 4:33 PM, Peter Robinson 
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> http://www.linuxinsider.com/story/83446.html
>>> ___
>>> IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
>>> i...@lists.sugarlabs.org
>>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
>>
>>
> ___
> IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
> i...@lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
___
SoaS mailing list
SoaS@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/soas


Re: [SoaS] [IAEP] SoaS Review/Article

2016-05-15 Thread Peter Robinson
Fedora 24

On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 10:41 AM, T.K. Kang  wrote:
> Great. It is sugar .106. Would like to use .108 sugar with better network
> connectivity.
> Where can we get this build?
>
> Cheers
>
> On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 4:33 PM, Peter Robinson 
> wrote:
>>
>> http://www.linuxinsider.com/story/83446.html
>> ___
>> IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
>> i...@lists.sugarlabs.org
>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
>
>
___
SoaS mailing list
SoaS@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/soas


[SoaS] SoaS Review/Article

2016-05-15 Thread Peter Robinson
http://www.linuxinsider.com/story/83446.html
___
SoaS mailing list
SoaS@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/soas