On 8 March 2013 16:23, Vadim Zeitlin wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Feb 2013 13:13:44 + Mateusz Loskot wrote:
> ML> Implementation options:
> ML>
> ML> 1) Keep current soci::session interface for backward compatibility,
> ML> add new ctor and open() taking the context - less intrusive, good for
> SOCI
On Mon, 11 Feb 2013 13:13:44 + Mateusz Loskot wrote:
ML> Yet another proposal open for comments:
ML>
ML> What about using the little Encapsulated Context pattern?
...
ML> Implementation options:
ML>
ML> 1) Keep current soci::session interface for backward compatibility,
ML> add new ctor and
On 24 February 2013 20:26, vaclav wrote:
> Just one more thing to consider. Sometimes we need not only a better way
> to specify session options before calling "connect", but also an interface
> for asking what session options are actually in use.
> [...]
Generally, it is a good idea and unified
View this message in context:
http://soci.6940.n7.nabble.com/soci-users-RFD-how-to-specify-whether-ODBC-backend-should-prompt-the-user-tp3240p3329.html
Sent from the soci-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Everyone
On 10 February 2013 23:37, Vadim Zeitlin wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Feb 2013 01:05:39 + Mateusz Loskot wrote:
> ML> On 3 February 2013 21:39, Vadim Zeitlin wrote:
> ...
> ML> > I'd like to propose with the solution based on adding a
> ML> > soci::backend_options class which would just wrap std::map
On Mon, 4 Feb 2013 01:05:39 + Mateusz Loskot wrote:
ML> On 3 February 2013 21:39, Vadim Zeitlin wrote:
...
ML> > I'd like to propose with the solution based on adding a
ML> > soci::backend_options class which would just wrap std::map
ML> > but might provide a simpler/higher level adapter ov
On 3 February 2013 21:39, Vadim Zeitlin wrote:
> On Sat, 2 Feb 2013 21:37:58 + Mateusz Loskot wrote:
> ML> On 31 January 2013 21:11, Vadim Zeitlin wrote:
> ML> >
> ML> > [...]
> ML> > So I see several alternatives, let me list them here
> ML> > with their pros and cons:
> ML> >
> ML> > 0. Ju
On Sat, 2 Feb 2013 21:37:58 + Mateusz Loskot wrote:
ML> On 31 January 2013 21:11, Vadim Zeitlin wrote:
ML> > At least under Windows, it's common for the ODBC driver to show a dialog
ML> > box to the user asking to enter the missing information when connecting
via
ML> > a predefined DSN. Ty
On 31 January 2013 21:11, Vadim Zeitlin wrote:
> At least under Windows, it's common for the ODBC driver to show a dialog
> box to the user asking to enter the missing information when connecting via
> a predefined DSN. Typically, the password is not stored in the DSN, where
> it could be easily
Hello,
At least under Windows, it's common for the ODBC driver to show a dialog
box to the user asking to enter the missing information when connecting via
a predefined DSN. Typically, the password is not stored in the DSN, where
it could be easily seen, but entered during connection time in thi
10 matches
Mail list logo