Cambell, this discussion does very much relate to
social credit, for a number of reasons, as I informed
you off list.
I am trying to separate the cult-like accretions to
social credit from the substance of the Douglas
message. It is my contention that much if not most
of what many of those
--0-81115337-1058985125=3D:16674
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3Dus-ascii
Michael Bindner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2003 10:58:4=
6 -0700 (PDT)
From: Michael Bindner=20
Subject: Re: [SOCIAL CREDIT] Sun, cow, fish, machine, hydroelectric dam, i=
=3Dnternet
To: [EMAIL
Comments below by Bill Ryan are generally consistent with my reading so far.
I will use this as a checklist in getting through to the end.
Keith
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 9:54 AM
Subject: Re: [SOCIAL CREDIT] The Lost
Dear All,
At last!
Keith Wilde has openly admitted that non-human things play a part, and often
a considerable one, in production, just as humans do. That is EXACTLY what
the binary analysis of physical productiveness says. Productiveness is
about work done -- who or what does it in the
