RE: [SOCIAL CREDIT] final comment-Gunning

2003-11-09 Thread william_b_ryan
**In any case, you say it is directed at all retail businesses. Do you assume that a uniform amount will be given to each business?** No, it is a flat percentage of each firm's sales, like a sales tax in reverse, except the program has no connection with the taxing

Re: [SOCIAL CREDIT] final comment-Gunning

2003-11-09 Thread Pat Gunning
Thanks, Bill. I have been mistaken in thinking that you were an economist. This is where we part company. It is only in a world without scarcity that a money tree could take root. In such a world, there is no need for economists. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -- **To fully understand the effects

Re: [SOCIAL CREDIT] final comment-Gunning-sarcasm

2003-11-09 Thread Keith Wilde
by respectable economists which do indeed seem to repudiate scarcity. Keith Wilde - Original Message - From: Pat Gunning [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, November 09, 2003 7:48 PM Subject: Re: [SOCIAL CREDIT] final comment-Gunning-sarcasm Bill, I think that you

Re: [SOCIAL CREDIT] final comment-Gunning-sarcasm

2003-11-09 Thread william_b_ryan
claims against capital, which generate increasing [12] income in the form of dividends or their functional equivalent, as [13] capital accumulates. -- Original Message Follows From: Pat Gunning [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [SOCIAL CREDIT

Re: [SOCIAL CREDIT] final comment-Gunning-sarcasm

2003-11-09 Thread william_b_ryan
. Original Message Follows From: Keith Wilde [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [SOCIAL CREDIT] final comment-Gunning-sarcasm Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2003 23:08:52 -0800 Well, this is a relief. A couple of weeks ago [snipped