If Bill Ryan does not agree
that:
1. the gap between
prices and incomes is made up by interest bearing debt created by the financial
system.
2. that Social Credit advocates
that this gap should be created as a dividend.
Then we must ask:
1. Where does the B equivalent
come from?
Dear Ekky,
In reading over this archive of our exchange I note
two points:
(1) You haveimplicitly agreed with my initial
observation that the "full employment" issue is an important element in the
"anti-semitism" accusation against Social Credit.
(2) There is a presumption in your remarks,
At 11:10 AM 6/13/2003 -0700, William B. Ryan wrote:
The question was: Why are not 'B' payments regarded
as an addition to purchasing power?
The answer is very simple.
First, the theorem as such is complex and can be
discerned only through a thorough reading of the
entirety of Douglas' work,
Douglas never said the "B equivalent" is created as an "interest bearing debt." In fact, Douglas never used the term "interest bearing debt." To prove me wrong find one instance from his thirty year public career where used the term. In *Economic Democracy* he referred to both "loan credit" and
Pretty kinky, yes, John, but it's the most powerful
political block in the country.
To them, most Christians are not Christians. To be a
Christian you have to be born again.
Jimmy Carter could give away the Panama Canal because
the Rapture was coming soon so it wouldn't matter
what happened
In a message dated 6/14/03 7:10:34 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
-(Ekk)- Frankly speaking I don't see a way to escape the
slanderous anti-Semitic label, since banking empires
are the 'dark force' we oppose, and whatever the
background of these powerful elites may be, it
http://www.shopnetdaily.com/store/item.asp?ITEM_ID=1271
By Michael D. Evans
THE BOOK THAT KNOCKED HILLARY OFF THE #2 AMAZON SPOT!
In his smash best-seller Beyond Iraq: The next
move, Michael D. Evans clearly defines the roles
that America, Iraq and Israel play in the fulfillment
of Bible
In a message dated 6/14/03 9:16:54 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Joe Thomson asks:
...would it not be logical to see just WHO those in opposition really are, and WHY they are so opposed, and HOW they are able to make their opposition so effective? And is this not what
Dear Keith,
I'll have to admit that when you put it in such stark contrast it is a picture
that canlook scary. Scary to myself, sinceuntil a couple of years
ago before looking into the history of money/finance banking
empires,mythinking on the 'conspiracy of control' was more in line
- Original Message -
From:
Ekky
Irion
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, June 14, 2003 1:11
PM
Subject: Re: [SOCIAL CREDIT] Social
Credit at War?
Dear Keith,
..my believe is that bankers will use
the anti-Semitic label because it is a handy
Four points.
1. Item 1 is absolute nonsense. The policy of full employment
is simply a policy to ensure that everyone has a job irrespective of what that
job is. the purpose for employment under the current system is to distribute
incomes. for those with no job or chance of employment here
11 matches
Mail list logo
