[SOCIAL CREDIT] The Primary Question

2003-06-17 Thread sutton
I have the impression that our learned friends on this panel sometimes dodge the simple questions, the answers to which could lead to popularising Mr DouglasĀ“ ideas, and often resort to verbal abuse to silence the enquirer. To start afresh, with no animosity, I ask, What, precisley defined, is

Re: [SOCIAL CREDIT] The Primary Question

2003-06-17 Thread ThomsonHiyu
In a message dated 6/16/03 11:32:22 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: have the impression that our learned friends on this panel sometimes dodge the simple questions, the answers to which could lead to popularising Mr DouglasĀ“ ideas, and often resort to verbal abuse to

RE: [SOCIAL CREDIT] Most people who reject the fallacy are not bankers???

2003-06-17 Thread william_b_ryan
-And I believe he's right about 'interest/usury' being mistaken as the sole cause of the problem by many so-called 'Social Credit groups. - Forget about "sole cause." It is not even a cause--period--of the deficiency of purchasing power enunciated by Douglas. The *cause* is the failure to

Re: [SOCIAL CREDIT] statement of fact

2003-06-17 Thread william_b_ryan
Because money is not debt but credit. The continuing obligation is from debtor to creditor. For example, your paycheck. But the check is good only at the company store. You want to spend it at any store. How is that accomplished? -- - Original Message - DATE: Tue, 17

[SOCIAL CREDIT] jessop

2003-06-17 Thread Triumphofthepast
"What, precisley defined, is the problem to which Mr Douglas has provided an answer?" (Jessop) Poverty; economic insecurity; overwork; the anxiety, fatigue, and boredom that accompany these; resulting crime; stress on economic resources from rampant waste. How's that? Michael Lane Triumph of the

[SOCIAL CREDIT] reply to Ekky

2003-06-17 Thread william_b_ryan
Brief replies are inserted below. -- Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 00:08:21 -0400 From: Ekky Irion [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dear Social Crediters, I'm asking your help with understanding the aspect of payments of interest in relation to shortage of money supply. I'm stuck on this for several reasons.

[SOCIAL CREDIT] reply to Michael

2003-06-17 Thread william_b_ryan
Brief replies are inserted below: -- Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 08:57:55 EDT From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dear Friends, Ekky asks about interest and conspiracy. There's nothing wrong with his argument about interest per se, and I believe it would be possible for money to be created and lent

RE: [SOCIAL CREDIT] newcredits

2003-06-17 Thread william_b_ryan
I'm in a hurry so can't spend a lot of time on this at the moment, so I'll just insert some quick comments below: -- Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 12:50:28 EDT From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [SOCIAL CREDIT] newcredits Dear Friends, The moment that any of that money that was held in

[SOCIAL CREDIT] no

2003-06-17 Thread Triumphofthepast
Dear Friends, In reply to the Lion's "quick comment," I have never quoted either James Robertson or Silvio Gesell. As for the rest--Vic? Michael ==^^=== This email was sent to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here:

[SOCIAL CREDIT] Two questions to Bill Ryan

2003-06-17 Thread Campbell Rayfield
Bill, Just two quick questions regarding money creation: 1. How does money come into existence? 2. Do banks lend their deposits? Regards Campbell Rayfield ==^^=== This email was sent to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] EASY

[SOCIAL CREDIT] Douglas vs Ryan

2003-06-17 Thread Campbell Rayfield
Ekky Irionafter finding out that money/credit is created by banks out of 'nothing', the following question is naturally, why then do we have to pay interest on it? (e.g., unlike paying rent for a house, a real tangible construct, paying 'rent' for 'invented' money as in an intangible

[SOCIAL CREDIT] Douglas vs Ryan

2003-06-17 Thread Campbell Rayfield
Ekky Irionafter finding out that money/credit is created by banks out of 'nothing', the following question is naturally, why then do we have to pay interest on it? (e.g., unlike paying rent for a house, a real tangible construct, paying 'rent' for 'invented' money as in an intangible

RE: [SOCIAL CREDIT] no

2003-06-17 Thread william_b_ryan
Michael, I didn't say you quoted Gesell. It is true however your theories are closer to Gesell than Douglas. I will grant you may not be aware of that. As to Robertson, this is what you wrote this very morning in your ekkyquestions post: Robertson also describes what he calls the Financial

Re: [SOCIAL CREDIT] Douglas vs Ryan

2003-06-17 Thread william_b_ryan
As to the first Douglas quote, I should say it was a bit of rhetorical excess to a particular audience. The only similarity, however, between what I said and the Douglas quote is that the word "counterfeiter" is used in both. I've already posted to this list the photocopy ofa personal letter from

Re: [SOCIAL CREDIT] hangthebastards

2003-06-17 Thread Ekky Irion
"Robertson also describes what he calls the Financial Filter--which allows only the most well-oiled minds to pass to the highest levels. Very intelligent people can still be completely blind when they have sold their wills to the service of a mechanism. Douglas says those at the top are