Hi
I uses many, many 4801 and 5501 as VDSL routers and firewalls running various
releases of OpenBSD. I never used a 6501 with OpenBSD as VDSL router/firewall.
What are people's experiences with the net 6501 and (recent) OpenBSDs, for
firewalling and VPN purposes?
- thx
Been running 5.4 without any problems, on a 6501-50 box with + 2.5
HDDs in softraid1, using it as a firewall/mail server/VPN/ssh
proxy/nfs (storage connected to the external USB).
So far it's doing well.
It IS going to be hot tho :/
Currently it's idle (i.e. load 1%) and the Atom is running
We will be soon getting a 25Mb/s link and I was wondering what max
throughput people had found for various models of Soekris boards - I
have some 4801s and a 5501 at the moment but was concerned that these
might not have the grunt to cope, especially as it would become my end
of a PPPoE link and
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 07:59:01AM +1100, Malcolm Herbert wrote:
We will be soon getting a 25Mb/s link and I was wondering what max
throughput people had found for various models of Soekris boards - I
have some 4801s and a 5501 at the moment but was concerned that these
might not have the grunt
I'm using a 5501 to do routing and DNS (with Debian) and I regularly push the
full 100mbps that my ISP provides (it comes out to ~96mbps) through it with no
problems. —
Sent from Mailbox for iPhone
On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 2:08 PM, Malcolm Herbert m...@mjch.net wrote:
We will be soon getting a
Nikola, I think your tjmax assumption may be off by 10, skewing your sysctl
results.
My 6501 box(es) run at 65-68C typically, rackmounted with 1U above and below
each, in a 25C room, running PFSense. That being said, yeah, they run a little
hotter than I’d like. I’m probably going to buy
ED, according to Intel, the tjmax for the 1 GHz Atom is 90 C (speaking
about the E640 here)?
There's also the 640T with tjmax of 110 C.
http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/intelligent-systems/queens-bay/embedded-intel-atom-e6xx-series-with-intel-platform-controller-hub-eg20t.html
But how does
I apologize for being unclear. I agree that your TJ-Max is 90. I think your
sysctl measurement sounds high, as if sysctl is assuming a tjmax off 100 when
calculating the offset.
http://lists.soekris.com/pipermail/soekris-tech/2012-January/018121.html
Or perhaps you are smarter than me, and I
I meant no disrespect, apologies if you felt offended.
I'm also using OpenBSD, not Linux.
Best regards,
Nikola Gyurov
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 12:18 AM, ED Fochler soek...@liquidbinary.com wrote:
I apologize for being unclear. I agree that your TJ-Max is 90. I think your
sysctl measurement
