On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 03:57:52PM +0100, Nix wrote:
Oh. Yeah. You're probably right. /proc/sys/net is still not deprecated
though, as far as I know, and can't be deprecated without breaking the
world.
All the sysctl(8) command does is write values to /proc. It's just a
more standardized way to
On 5/26/11 9:32 PM, Matt Ryanczak wrote:
You probably want something like this in /etc/network/interfaces:
iface br0 inet static
bridge_ports eth1 eth2 eth3 eth4
address 192.168.1.1
netmask 255.255.255.0
see:
On 27 May 2011, Michael Stone verbalised:
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 02:32:42PM +0100, Nix wrote:
I think you got that backwards. The sysctl() syscall is very, very
deprecated, so deprecated that huge chunks of it are rotten and
nonfunctional at any given time, so deprecated that most of it has
On 5/24/11 3:06 PM, Matt Ryanczak wrote:
On 05/24/2011 05:15 AM, Lars Noodén wrote:
On 5/24/11 11:29 AM, Luc Michel wrote:
If you only want the internal interfaces acting like a switch, you can
bridge them together:
$ brctl addbr br0
$ brctl addif br0 eth0
$ brctl addif br0 eth1
...
Then
On 5/24/11 3:06 PM, Matt Ryanczak wrote:
brctl addbr br0
brctl addif br0 eth1
...
ifconfig br0 192.168.1.1 netmask 255.255.255.0
ifconfig br0 up
I can ping 192.168.1.1 from on the router itself, but not from devices
plugged into eth0 - eth3 and dnsmasq is running but cannot serve DHCP
to
On 5/24/11 3:06 PM, Matt Ryanczak wrote:
Assuming you have eth0,1,2,3,4,5 and eth0 is the external interface you
would something like this:
brctl addbr br0
brctl addif br0 eth1
brctl addif br0 eth2
brctl addif br0 eth3
[snip]
ifconfig br0 192.168.1.1 netmask 255.255.255.0
ifconfig br0
On 5/24/11 3:06 PM, Matt Ryanczak wrote:
brctl addbr br0
brctl addif br0 eth1
brctl addif br0 eth2
brctl addif br0 eth3
brctl addif br0 eth4
ifconfig br0 192.168.1.1 netmask 255.255.255.0
ifconfig br0 up
How should I go about making those settings permanent?
Is that something that should
It depends on your linux distro, but I think for debian that's the file!
http://www.debian-administration.org/articles/254
2011/5/26 Lars Noodén lars.noo...@gmail.com:
On 5/24/11 3:06 PM, Matt Ryanczak wrote:
brctl addbr br0
brctl addif br0 eth1
brctl addif br0 eth2
brctl addif br0 eth3
On 05/26/2011 01:50 PM, Lars Noodén wrote:
On 5/24/11 3:06 PM, Matt Ryanczak wrote:
brctl addbr br0
brctl addif br0 eth1
brctl addif br0 eth2
brctl addif br0 eth3
brctl addif br0 eth4
ifconfig br0 192.168.1.1 netmask 255.255.255.0
ifconfig br0 up
How should I go about making those
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 3:28 AM, Lars Noodén lars.noo...@gmail.com wrote:
What would the masquerading rule look like, assuming eth4 is the
external interface and 0-3 are the internal network?
The very simple answer is this:
iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o eth4 -j MASQUERADE
but your really
All of the documentation I've found so far for setting Linux (debian) up
as a router involves only two network interfaces. I'm using a net5501
which has four ethernet and one ADSL.
Can anyone point me in the direction of how to set up a linux router
with five interfaces, one external and four
Just assign IP address to all interfaces and set
/proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward to 1 .
If you wan't firewall functions also just set iptables ad apropriate.
~pete
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 11:00 AM, Lars Noodén lars.noo...@gmail.com wrote:
All of the documentation I've found so far for setting
On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 11:32 +0300, Pete wrote:
Just assign IP address to all interfaces and set
/proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward to 1 .
If you wan't firewall functions also just set iptables ad apropriate.
in fact, /proc/sys/net ... is deprecated
you should use sysctl instead
also, you should
On 5/24/11 11:29 AM, Luc Michel wrote:
If you only want the internal interfaces acting like a switch, you can
bridge them together:
$ brctl addbr br0
$ brctl addif br0 eth0
$ brctl addif br0 eth1
...
Then use the br0 interface instead of the ethx ones, put an IP address on it
and modify
Hi Lars,
On 05/24/2011 04:00 AM, Lars Noodén wrote:
Can anyone point me in the direction of how to set up a linux router
with five interfaces, one external and four internal?
I do not know of a guide for this but if you explain what you are trying
to do I might be able to help you.
Do you
On 05/24/2011 05:15 AM, Lars Noodén wrote:
On 5/24/11 11:29 AM, Luc Michel wrote:
If you only want the internal interfaces acting like a switch, you can
bridge them together:
$ brctl addbr br0
$ brctl addif br0 eth0
$ brctl addif br0 eth1
...
Then use the br0 interface instead of the ethx
On 5/24/11 3:00 PM, Matt Ryanczak wrote:
Do you desire the four internal interfaces to be individually routed
network segments or are you trying to have all of them be on the same
network like a switch (or a bridge)?
Thanks, Matt. It would be ideal to have them all on the same network.
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 8:15 AM, Lars Noodén lars.noo...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks, Matt. It would be ideal to have them all on the same network.
Just follow Matt's instructions then and remember to add an iptables
rule to do masquerading (NAT).
Note also that the combined inter-NIC speed of
18 matches
Mail list logo
