Re: [Soekris] freebsd jails vs linux vservers on net5501

2012-05-20 Thread Philip
when I do pkg_add -r somepackage the program gets the package from ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-8.3-release/Latest/; so it just works. however when I do pkg_upgrade -a I get fetch: ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-8-release/INDEX: File unavailable

Re: [Soekris] freebsd jails vs linux vservers on net5501

2012-05-20 Thread Uffe Jakobsen
Hi Philip, On 2012-05-20 13:20, Philip wrote: okay, figured it out adding setenv PACKAGESITE ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-8.3-release/Latest/; to the end of /root/.cshrc then log out and in again seems to fix the issue. HINT#1: Your own solution above does

Re: [Soekris] freebsd jails vs linux vservers on net5501

2012-05-09 Thread Uffe Jakobsen
On 2012-04-30 12:20, Philip wrote: The problem is that the freebsd install isn't well patched because I just can't get along with the package management as well as debian apt. Can you be more specific as to what problems you have with FreeBSD package management - maybe we could help you ?

Re: [Soekris] freebsd jails vs linux vservers on net5501

2012-05-09 Thread Philip
I suppose that pkg_upgrade -a is equivalent to apt-get update then apt-get upgrade, which isn't so hard. hmm Oh and current isn't stable :S and whenever I try to post anything on the forum I get pulled to pieces about the quality of my grammer and formating of posts. Maybe I should try again

Re: [Soekris] freebsd jails vs linux vservers on net5501

2012-05-09 Thread Philip
It's about power consumption and availability. The soekris consumes only 5W or something and will run off of an old car battery for a day or more. There's no point in having a security box that's running but the web/email server is out. thanks, Philip On 09/05/12 03:24, Izaac wrote: On Mon,

Re: [Soekris] freebsd jails vs linux vservers on net5501

2012-05-09 Thread Izaac
On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 03:11:19PM +0100, Philip wrote: It's about power consumption and availability. Yep. Security regularly winds up being a trade off. The soekris consumes only 5W or something and will run off of an old car battery for a day or more. There's no point in having a

Re: [Soekris] freebsd jails vs linux vservers on net5501

2012-05-09 Thread Philip
Nothing on my debian file server needs to be 24/7. It's things like photos, music, ISO images. However I do want it segregated from the Internet. Actually I might have to have attempt 2 at nanobsd as that appears to be targeted at what I am trying to do. I tried to compile it on a freebsd

Re: [Soekris] freebsd jails vs linux vservers on net5501

2012-05-09 Thread Frank Schuhmann
Hi Philip and list, I want to suggest you to run on the net5501 only a security solution likes OpenBSD + PF, or something like pfSense, mOnOwall, or any firewall distro you like and trust. If this is not in the range of your budget (because you wasn't telling something about) and you donĀ“t

Re: [Soekris] freebsd jails vs linux vservers on net5501

2012-05-08 Thread The Fungi
On 2012-05-09 01:08:20 +0200 (+0200), JF Straeten wrote: [...] One more choice : Debian + LXC (Linux Containers). [...] Semi-recent discussions on the oss-sec list suggest LXC doesn't yet provide good separation from a security perspective... for example, this rather longish thread:

Re: [Soekris] freebsd jails vs linux vservers on net5501

2012-05-08 Thread Malcolm Herbert
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 11:20:07AM +0100, Philip wrote: |The problem is that the freebsd install isn't well patched because I |just can't get along with the package management as well as debian |apt. I used to get along with netbsd package management okay but that |doesn't have jails. Now it has