Re: [Soekris] Debian install on 4801, eth0 won't work.

2010-02-23 Thread The Fungi
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 08:33:04AM +0100, Jan Ceuleers wrote: [...] r...@skr03:~# df . Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on /dev/sda5 6973240870264 5748748 14% / That's an Ubuntu Karmic server install (with manpages, Squid, Apache, what have

Re: [Soekris] Debian install on 4801, eth0 won't work.

2010-02-23 Thread Bob Camp
Hi Not real sure that X would do a lot of good on a 4801 box Bob -Original Message- From: soekris-tech-boun...@lists.soekris.com [mailto:soekris-tech-boun...@lists.soekris.com] On Behalf Of The Fungi Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 10:49 AM To: soekris-tech@lists.soekris.com

Re: [Soekris] Debian install on 4801, eth0 won't work.

2010-02-23 Thread der Mouse
Not real sure that X would do a lot of good on a 4801 box I don't see why not. It was useful on Sun-3s, which were significantly wimpier. Perhaps you're confusing X with insanely bloated modern desktop environments built atop X, like KDE and Gnome? (X is not a window system; it's a

Re: [Soekris] Debian install on 4801, eth0 won't work.

2010-02-23 Thread Arnt Gulbrandsen
On 02/23/2010 06:59 PM, der Mouse wrote: Not real sure that X would do a lot of good on a 4801 box I don't see why not. It was useful on Sun-3s, which were significantly wimpier. I got XFCE up and running on a Lifebook S-4572 a couple of weeks ago. The 4572 is comparable to the 4801 in

Re: [Soekris] Debian install on 4801, eth0 won't work.

2010-02-23 Thread Jed Clear
On Tue Feb 23 12:59 , der Mouse sent: Not real sure that X would do a lot of good on a 4801 box I don't see why not. It was useful on Sun-3s, which were significantly wimpier. Perhaps you're confusing X with insanely bloated modern desktop environments built atop X, like KDE and Gnome?