On date Wednesday 2009-01-07 19:49:38 +0200, Pekka Pessi phoned this:
2009/1/7 Stefano Sabatini ssabat...@reilabs.com:
I wonder if it is actually possible to catch somehow a REGISTER
timeout condition. Currently the behaviour of the sofia-sip stack
seems to try the REGISTER again and again
Hi all,
There is a specification for conformance test of RFC 3261 defined by ETSI (
www.etsi.org): ETSI TS 102 027-2 V4.1.1 Conformance Test Specification for
SIP (IETF RFC
3261)http://webapp.etsi.org/workprogram/Report_WorkItem.asp?WKI_ID=19800
I started a job to validate the sofia in
Could I add the Supported and ms-keep-alive portions of that
header?
Sure, SIPTAG_SUPPORTED_STR(gruu-10, adhoclist),
SIPTAG_HEADER_STR(ms-keep-alive: uac;hop-hop=yes)
Great!
You need 3 request-responses for authentication? Or should we include
something in the first REGISTER. Nua
2009/1/8 Andrew Rechenberg Lists flux...@resurgent.com:
Yes, if there are several WWW-Authenticate challenges they are linked
via au_next.
For some reason the NTLM WWW-Authenticate header is the only one that it
finds. The Kerberos header is not in the au_next. Any reason why this
would be
2009/1/8 Stefano Sabatini ssabat...@reilabs.com:
I mean that when the REGISTER recipient doesn't reply, sofia-sip sends
again and again the REGISTER. I would like to catch this condition say
after N tries and when a certain timeout expires, and notify the
sofia-sip stack of this.
Currently I
Hi;
I think you can use NTA_TAGS like:
NTATAG_SIP_T1X64 to set the timeout of the REGISTER transaction.
Setting this value will still use the other Tx timers and send
retransmissions but you
will have control of the timeout value the stack will return a timeout
response.
Regards
Inca R
On
Perhaps there is a problem parsing the Kerberos header? Could you send
a trace containing such a WWW-Authenticate header.
Here's a snipped trace (also available at
http://dpaste.com/hold/106771/)
tport_recv_event(0x1044830)
tport_tls_recv(0x1044830): tls_read() returned -1
Regarding the NAT_SIP_Tx tags;
Can they be used per transaction ?
For example setting the Timers when creating a new handle or in
nua_invite/ nua_register ???
Thanks
Inca R
On Jan 8, 2009, at 5:37 PM, Pekka Pessi wrote:
2009/1/8 Stefano Sabatini ssabat...@reilabs.com:
I mean that when the
2009/1/8 Paulo Pizarro paulo.piza...@gmail.com:
There is a specification for conformance test of RFC 3261 defined by ETSI
(www.etsi.org): ETSI TS 102 027-2 V4.1.1 Conformance Test Specification for
SIP (IETF RFC 3261)
I started a job to validate the sofia in accordance with this
2009/1/8 Pekka Pessi ppe...@gmail.com:
There is nothing wrong here, but it looks like parsing two
WWW-Authenticate headers just fails. *Blush*. I'll have a peek in the
parer
OK, parser was just configured to reject multiple WWW-Authenticate
headers, probably copypaste error from HTTP. I've
This posting was generated automatically from darcs repo
http://sofia-sip.org/repos/sofia-sip.
Thu Jan 8 20:04:21 EET 2009 Pekka Pessi first.l...@nokia.com
* sofia-sip/su_string.h: added
Adding locale-independent, NULL-safe string comparison,
matching and searching functions:
-
11 matches
Mail list logo
