> I would triple check the strings you are putting into the tags for this.
> I have never seen something like this unless it was actually me somehow
> buffer overflowing into it.
>
>
> On May 25, 2016, at 11:16 AM, Francesco Lamonica
> wrote:
>
> Hello Michael,
> sorry, ob
Hello Michael,
sorry, obviously i meant SIP :)
On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 12:02 AM, Michael Jerris wrote:
> Callid in sdp?
>
>
> On Saturday, May 14, 2016, Francesco Lamonica
> wrote:
>
>> Hi all, i know this might be a shot in the dark however...
>> i a
Hi all, i know this might be a shot in the dark however...
i am experiencing a strange issue, randomically on a UAC that uses
sofia-sip (latest stable from repository) when putting the remote on-hold.
the scenario is the following
sofia-uac -> invites
100
180
200
sofia-uac -> on hold (changing the
Hi all,
i noticed a very strange behaviour on latest sofia (last packaged one):
On mac os x (ranging from snow leopard to mavericks) if a request message
like INFO is lost (i encountered with an unstable wifi link and later
tested by simply disconnecting the uplink cable of the router attached to
m
Hi all,
in latest stable version of sofia i noticed a strange behaviour
A invites B
and both parties sends INFO to each other
then cable is disconnected and no connection happens between the parties
A sends (tries to) a BYE and when receives a 503 destroys the handle
associated to the sip dialog.
A
what if he does not know the correct route?
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 8:58 PM, Michael Jerris wrote:
> Don't bind to 0.0.0.0. Bind to the interface address of the network
> device that you want to show up in your sip packets.
>
> Mike
>
> On Sep 12, 2012, at 10:47 PM, "Huang, Kun-Yao" wrote:
>
Hi Jerry, did you solve the problem? i might have the same issue with the
VPN
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 8:41 PM, Jerry Richards
wrote:
> I have a Freeswitch issue, where I have softphones connected to two
> separate subnets (one on eth0 and the other on eth1). When I send an IM
> (i.e. SIP MESS
Hi all,
sofia responded with a 500 status message to my nua_shutdown() call.
This seems to happen randomly on a linux machine that has a NIC that is
configured with multiple aliases (eth0, eth0:0, eth0:1) and two VLANs bound
to the same physical NIC.
what is the recommended practice?
should i try t
Hi all, i have a doubt regarding the aforementioned function
if i pass two sdp_rtpmap_t objects to that, i get as returned value a
new struct with all the codecs of the second one that follow the first
matching codec. is this correct? i kind of imagined i would get all
the matching ones
i.e
object
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 12:48 PM, elisa_murgia wrote:
> Hello Francesco, hi all,
> have you solve your problem? I'm also having problem to get nua_r_shutdown
> signal, handling the eventloop with su_root_step. I'm using sofia 1.12.10 at
> the moment.
>
> The problem is that, after executing nua_sh
Hi, i just noticed that there is a difference between the way
NUTAG_APPL_METHOD() and NUTAG_ALLOW_METHOD() are handled on linux (amd64
gentoo and ubuntu 9.04) and win32 (msvc 2008)
are handled by compilers:
On windows (following what is written in the documentation) i use
nua_set_params(nua, NUTA
Hi, i am trying to have sofia list the allowed methods so in the callback
function i use code like this:
case nua_r_get_params:
char const* method = 0;
tl_gets(tags,NUTAG_ALLOW_REF(method),TAG_END());
printf("%s",
Hello Robert,
may i ask what platform and sofia version are use using? I am facing the
same issue but i dont'even get the nua_r_shutdown message...
thanks
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 11:28 PM, Robert Han wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I just want to raise the issue that we asked you earlier back in July 31
> (s
That is the only output i get after the call to nua_shutdown()
No, i didnt use that call, i simply set the env vars NUA_DEBUG and
NTA_DEBUG to 9
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 2:25 PM, Pekka Pessi wrote:
> 2009/9/29 Francesco Lamonica :
>> Hi all, this is what i get (with latest darcs) wh
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 4:44 PM, Francesco Lamonica
wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 9:57 AM, Pekka Pessi wrote:
>> 2009/9/23 Francesco Lamonica :
>>> hi ppl, i am having some problems in shutting down the nua; i am still
>>> using sofia 1.12.9 and i am handling the
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 9:57 AM, Pekka Pessi wrote:
> 2009/9/23 Francesco Lamonica :
>> hi ppl, i am having some problems in shutting down the nua; i am still
>> using sofia 1.12.9 and i am handling the eventloop with su_root_step.
>>
>> I read on the list the proce
hi ppl, i am having some problems in shutting down the nua; i am still
using sofia 1.12.9 and i am handling the eventloop with su_root_step.
I read on the list the procedure pessi suggested:
1. call nua_shutdown(mynua)
2. wait for nua_r_shutdown with status code 200 then
3. call nua_destroy
Hi Stefano,
I am no VS2005 expert either but i had a few problems on lib
dependencies as well, what windows lib are you linking against right
now? (you can check it in the project properties under the LINKER
section)
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 5:27 PM, Stefano Sabatini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
On Jan 11, 2008 4:01 PM, Michael Jerris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
Hi Mike, are you sure this fix is enough? the _WIN32_WINNT is defined
to at least 0x501 so it enters that branch and does not complain about
the missing headers from the 'else' branch, but i am not certain it
would work with ipv6
Hi, i found a problem on win32 with the latest windows SDK (the one
with vista support)
in su.h (line 73 - sofia 1.12.7) it does not enter in the "then"
branch of the #if defined(IPPROTO_IPV6) and tries to use the
nonexistent tpipv6.h
thing is that with previous windows platform sdk (windows serve
Hi, i am using sofia-sip 1.12.5 on win32 and i noticed that every 25
minutes the stack resends the INVITE on the handle relative to the
ongoing call. Is that normal behaviour? if so, is it possible to
disable it? or change the timeout?
--
On 3/19/07, Pekka Pessi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Your loop sends a new register every timeit calls send_message()?
yes it was just a test app
I'd do it like
send_register(nua);
for (registered = 0; !registered;) {
su_root_step(root);
}
and change registered to 1 if REGISTER succeed
As i said in the other email i am just starting using sofia-sip so it is
most likely that i did something wrong.. however i stumbled into a
reproducible crash:
win32 VS2005 sofia-sip 1.12.5work1
the sip options example from the wiki
i changed the event loop from
su_root_run(root);
to
for (int
Hi, i am starting to develop with sofia-sip and was experimenting a bit with
the sip options example i found on the wiki.
i modified the example in order to send REGISTER and used a loop like this
to gather the proxy responses:
while(1)
{
Sleep(1000);
send_message (nua); //sends a REGIS
24 matches
Mail list logo
