Re: [Sofia-sip-devel] Ignoring Duplicate SDP

2008-07-14 Thread Oren Bouskila
Many Thanks -Original Message- From: Bernhard Suttner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 11, 2008 12:10 AM To: Oren Bouskila Cc: sofia-sip-devel Subject: RE: [Sofia-sip-devel] Ignoring Duplicate SDP Hi, please find the attached patch. This implemenation does work for us and

Re: [Sofia-sip-devel] Ignoring Duplicate SDP

2008-07-13 Thread Oren Bouskila
08 4:35 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Sofia-sip-devel] Ignoring Duplicate SDP Hi, I am using Sofia SIP (1.12.8) as a user agent (nua). 100rel is not activated. xxx <-> PBX <-> sofia sip uagent The PBX does send a Session Progress (183) with SDP with RTP Port . After the X

Re: [Sofia-sip-devel] Ignoring Duplicate SDP

2008-07-10 Thread Bernhard Suttner
someone has already implemented "Pekka" solution please post it in > this thread. > > > Many Thanks > Oren Bouskila > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Bernhard Suttner > Sent: Wednesday, J

Re: [Sofia-sip-devel] Ignoring Duplicate SDP

2008-06-04 Thread Bernhard Suttner
Hi, > And mixing the ringback tone into the stream that's ultimately going to carry > voice is not an option? well, after the user agent receives the 200 OK with a new port it should stop sending/receiving on the old port and use the new port from 200 OK because the 183 Session Progress in only

Re: [Sofia-sip-devel] Ignoring Duplicate SDP

2008-06-04 Thread mikhail.zabaluev
Hi, >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On >Behalf Of ext Bernhard Suttner >Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 5:54 PM >To: Pekka Pessi >Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: [Sofia-sip-devel] Ignoring Duplicate SDP > >Hi,

Re: [Sofia-sip-devel] Ignoring Duplicate SDP

2008-06-04 Thread Pekka Pessi
2008/6/4 Bernhard Suttner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi, > > thanks for your fast answer. > >> You could hack nua_session.c not to ignore SDP, but compare it with >> previous one, and if they differ, generate new offer (and ignore it) >> and then feed new sdp as an answer to it. > > ok. I have another

Re: [Sofia-sip-devel] Ignoring Duplicate SDP

2008-06-04 Thread Bernhard Suttner
Hi, thanks for your fast answer. > You could hack nua_session.c not to ignore SDP, but compare it with > previous one, and if they differ, generate new offer (and ignore it) > and then feed new sdp as an answer to it. ok. I have another "hack": else if (!session_get_description(sip, &sdp, &le

Re: [Sofia-sip-devel] Ignoring Duplicate SDP

2008-06-04 Thread Pekka Pessi
2008/6/4 Bernhard Suttner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > The PBX does send a Session Progress (183) with SDP with RTP Port . > After the XXX picks up the PBX will send a 200 OK with SDP port not port > but 4112. In the RFC's point of view that is allowed. In principle you end up with two sessions

[Sofia-sip-devel] Ignoring Duplicate SDP

2008-06-04 Thread Bernhard Suttner
Hi, I am using Sofia SIP (1.12.8) as a user agent (nua). 100rel is not activated. xxx <-> PBX <-> sofia sip uagent The PBX does send a Session Progress (183) with SDP with RTP Port . After the XXX picks up the PBX will send a 200 OK with SDP port not port but 4112. In the RFC's point