So, is it easily fixable?
Thanks.
Fabio
On 8/22/07, Pekka Pessi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2007/8/22, Fabio Margarido <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > As you can see, the softphone adds a 'received' parameter to the Via
> > header. Is this what may be causing the message to be discarded?
>
> Nope, only
2007/8/22, Fabio Margarido <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> As you can see, the softphone adds a 'received' parameter to the Via
> header. Is this what may be causing the message to be discarded?
Nope, only the "host-port" and branch parameter are taken into account
when comparing Via.
My guess is that the
Hi all,
Just a quick update to the issue I reported earlier:
I set the SOFIA_DEBUG environment variable to 9 and found that I get
the following messages regarding the 487:
tport_wakeup_pri(0x806bbf0): events IN
tport_recv_event(0x806bbf0)
tport_recv_iovec(0x806bbf0) msg 0x8084fb0 from (udp/10.0.6
Hi there,
I am observing the following behavior from Sofia in my application:
I send an INVITE to a sip softphone in another machine, and receive
100 and 180 as responses. After some time, my application calls
nua_handle_destroy() on this call, and Sofia automatically sends a
CANCEL to the pendin
