On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 16:19 -0600, Jarod Neuner wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 11:44 -0600, Pekka Pessi wrote:
> > Also, if we want to do some automated Subject testing at tport level,
> > I'd go for using tpn_canon which should contain the domain name used
> > in the SIP URI.
>
> Through various m
Pekka,
Thanks for the quick response.
On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 11:44 -0600, Pekka Pessi wrote:
> tpn_subject breaks the binary compatibility
I was wondering if that would be an issue. The point was to get the
subject into vtp_connect() and perform subject verification before
tport_send_event()
2009/1/6 Jarod Neuner :
> This patch should wrap up the major changes to the tport module. A new
> pointer (tpn_subject) has been added to the tp_name_t structure, which
> defines the subject name of the intended recipient of each message.
Many thanks for your patch! Unfortunately adding new fiel
This patch should wrap up the major changes to the tport module. A new
pointer (tpn_subject) has been added to the tp_name_t structure, which
defines the subject name of the intended recipient of each message.
As before, these patches should not change the behavior of NTA or NUA.
The next patch
