alf Of ext Jan Van den bosch
> >Sent: Friday, July 27, 2007 10:43 AM
> >To: Pekka Pessi
> >Cc: sofia-sip-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> >Subject: Re: [Sofia-sip-devel] non-200 response to incoming MESSAGE
> >
> >Let's say I want to respond to a specific
Hi,
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
>Behalf Of ext Jan Van den bosch
>Sent: Friday, July 27, 2007 10:43 AM
>To: Pekka Pessi
>Cc: sofia-sip-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>Subject: Re: [Sofia-sip-devel] non-200 response to i
Hi,
Let's say I want to respond to a specific MESSAGE from outside of the
callback function, what is the easiest way to differentiate between
the different MESSAGEs? What structure do I save? SofSipCli keeps a
list of operation handles that correspond to their respective INVITEs,
but apparently a
2007/7/26, Jan Van den bosch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Exactly why do I have to include a NUTAG_WITH_THIS() tag when I'm
> responding to an incoming MESSAGE in my callback function? Responding
> to an incoming INVITE doesn't require this. :|
>
> ssc_i_message():
>
> nua_respond(nh, 200, NULL, NUTAG_WI
Hi,
Exactly why do I have to include a NUTAG_WITH_THIS() tag when I'm
responding to an incoming MESSAGE in my callback function? Responding
to an incoming INVITE doesn't require this. :|
ssc_i_message():
nua_respond(nh, 200, NULL, NUTAG_WITH_THIS(nua), TAG_END());
Thanks,
Jan
-