Hi there.
I believe there has been no progress in this issue I reported a few
months back. I would just like to know if it is still in your radar to
be fixed in the not so distant future.
Would you like me to open a bug for it to help you keep track of everything?
Thanks a lot.
On Thu, Feb 26, 200
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 12:30, Pekka Pessi wrote:
> When you return 480 to re-INVITE, nua considers the dialog terminated and
> clears its state.
I wonder why re-INVITEs are treated different (if indeed they are). I
believe this could cause other problems, as section 12.2.2 of the RFC
states: "
2009/2/19 Fabio Margarido :
> I'm observing some odd behavior from Sofia in the following scenario: I have
> an answered call and receive a re-INVITE; when I generate an error for the
> re-INVITE (480, for instance) and then try to send a BYE and destroy the leg
> in the sequence, the BYE is not se
