Hey, thanks for the response. I am still unclear on one thing though.
Where is the entry point to the program? Also, how is process_call()
indicated as the correct callback function to use. e.g something
similar to nua_create when using the nua library?
Thanks,
nnp
On 3/19/07, Diego Betancor <[EM
It is a little example..Hope it helps
Server Verifying Authentication
Tutorial for a server using nta and auth modules.
typedef struct application{
/* other data as needed ... including home, root, and default leg etc*/
auth_mod_t *autorizacion;
} application ;
int init(){
/* all th
Hey, I'm currently writing an application for fuzz testing SIP
compatible clients (soft phones, hard phones etc) and looking for a
simple way to deal with certain things I don't want to test in this
app.
One of these things is registration. I want to allow the the client to
register with the serve
Hi,
>-Original Message-
>From: ext Pekka Pessi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Monday, March 19, 2007 2:09 PM
>To: Zabaluev Mikhail (Nokia-M/Helsinki)
>Cc: sofia-sip-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>Subject: Re: [Sofia-sip-devel] Authentication state machinery
>
>> May it be that nua_authen
On 3/19/07, Pekka Pessi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Your loop sends a new register every timeit calls send_message()?
yes it was just a test app
I'd do it like
send_register(nua);
for (registered = 0; !registered;) {
su_root_step(root);
}
and change registered to 1 if REGISTER succeed
Hi again,
So far, I've tried this:
nua_set_params(nua, SIPTAG_AUTHORIZATION(NULL), TAG_END());
nua_set_hparams(nh, SIPTAG_AUTHORIZATION(NULL), TAG_END());
both in my nua_r_register() callback, and this:
nua_unregister(op->op_handle, SIPTAG_AUTHORIZATION(NULL), TAG_NULL());
in my unregister m
ok, with 1.12.5 I get a callback and it works ...
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Pekka Pessi
Gesendet: Montag, 19. März 2007 12:49
An: Sluschny, Thomas
Cc: sofia-sip-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Betreff: Re: [Sofia-sip-devel] Does
2007/3/14, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> There is another discovery: a call does not get terminated cleanly if a
> 401/407 response to INVITE is not handled with nua_authenticate(), e.g. due
> to absence of credentials to submit. Instead, after the final ACK is sent as
> per the call
2007/3/14, Francesco Lamonica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi, i am starting to develop with sofia-sip and was experimenting a bit with
> the sip options example i found on the wiki.
>
> i modified the example in order to send REGISTER and used a loop like this
> to gather the proxy responses:
>
>
>w
2007/3/13, Chung Pak Lai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> The problem I am having is that the second user SDP in the 200OK (INVITE
> with SDP) doesn't overwrite the SDP message in the first 200OK (INVITE
> without SDP).
Why it should overwrite it? If you want to use different SDP later,
you can set it with
2007/3/10, Noorulla Mohammad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> i'm trying to install sofia-sip library on linux platform. i had downloaded
> the library from
> http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=143636
> and chossen
> sofia-sip version 1.12.5. In the readme file these are the steps mentio
2007/3/8, Sluschny, Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> i use freeswitch with sofia and get a DECLINE from a SIP device after i sent
> an INVITE to it:
>
> send 995 bytes to udp/[192.168.1.1]:5060 at 14:54:35.476608:
>
>
>INVITE
2007/3/7, Helmut Kuper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I use WeSIP click2dial application with UACs registered to freeswitch.
> But when I establish a call via web app, freeswitch doesn't response
> with an OK to the INVITE (with no SDP) for the caller from wep app.
> Following RFC 3725 (http://www.faqs.org
13 matches
Mail list logo
