Re: Wiki EOL soon

2016-08-17 Thread Cristobal Infante
I can only imagine the server strain that this wiki must be causing on the Autodesk server... by the way, great investigative work Olivier! On 17 August 2016 at 21:40, Andy Nicholas wrote: > I think the privacy issue can be overcome. Have a look in the link I sent >

Re: Wiki EOL soon

2016-08-17 Thread Andy Nicholas
I think the privacy issue can be overcome. Have a look in the link I sent you under the section "Backup the content of the wiki (XML dump)". That method doesn't include account information. On 17/08/2016 21:17, Maurice Patel wrote: I have asked if we can look into this and got a first

Re: Wiki EOL soon

2016-08-17 Thread Stephen Davidson
There is always this: https://xsisupport.com/2014/04/17/softimage-2015-user-guide-compiled-help-file/ Best Regards, * Stephen P. Davidson* *(954) 552-7956*sdavid...@3danimationmagic.com *Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic* - Arthur C. Clarke

RE: Wiki EOL soon

2016-08-17 Thread Maurice Patel
I have asked if we can look into this and got a first response. Apparently it is non-trivial as the site enabled users to create accounts and there are some privacy issues around publishing the data as is. I can't promise anything but we are looking into what is feasible. maurice Maurice Patel

Re: Wiki EOL soon

2016-08-17 Thread Andy Nicholas
No problem. Thanks for looking into it. I'm sure quite a few of us will be keeping our fingers crossed! ;) A On 17/08/2016 20:14, Maurice Patel wrote: Thanks for sharing that. I'll look into whether we can do that. maurice Maurice Patel Tél: 514 954-7134 Cell: 514 242-6549 From:

RE: Wiki EOL soon

2016-08-17 Thread Andres Stephens
A local copy was the right word! Sorry. I panicked. -Draise From: Maurice Patel Sent: 17 August 2016 14:00 To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com Subject: RE: Wiki EOL soon HI, I am not sure what you mean by a physical copy

RE: Wiki EOL soon

2016-08-17 Thread Maurice Patel
Thanks for sharing that. I'll look into whether we can do that. maurice Maurice Patel Tél: 514 954-7134 Cell: 514 242-6549 From: softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com [mailto:softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com] On Behalf Of Andy Nicholas Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2016 3:13 PM To:

Re: Wiki EOL soon

2016-08-17 Thread Andy Nicholas
Hi Maurice, Is it conceivable that Autodesk would be willing to backup the wiki according to the instructions found here: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:Backing_up_a_wiki and then provide that data to an individual in the community to host on their own publicly available server? A

RE: Wiki EOL soon

2016-08-17 Thread Maurice Patel
HI, I am not sure what you mean by a physical copy but the wayback machine typically keeps archives of old sites which provides a certain level of availability but not all. If you need anything it may be best to save a local copy to your machine before November maurice Maurice Patel Tél:

Re: Wiki EOL soon

2016-08-17 Thread Andres Stephens
Crap crap crap. Where can we download a physical copy? -Draise +57 3138116821 Bogotá, Colombia On 17 Aug 2016, 12:57, at 12:57, Olivier Jeannel wrote: >http://softimage.wiki.softimage.com/index.php?title=Main_Page > >

Wiki EOL soon

2016-08-17 Thread Olivier Jeannel
http://softimage.wiki.softimage.com/index.php?title=Main_Page -- Softimage Mailing List. To unsubscribe, send a mail to softimage-requ...@listproc.autodesk.com with "unsubscribe" in the subject, and reply to confirm.

Re: OT: Camera lens distortion

2016-08-17 Thread Jordi Bares
Ha ha ha ha…. true, I don’t like it either jb > On 17 Aug 2016, at 13:35, Adam Seeley wrote: > > The 3DE interface gives me a headache. > > A. > > On 5 August 2016 at 18:57, Jordi Bares > wrote: > DxO do a fantastic

Re: OT: Camera lens distortion

2016-08-17 Thread Adam Seeley
The 3DE interface gives me a headache. A. On 5 August 2016 at 18:57, Jordi Bares wrote: > DxO do a fantastic job but of course they deal with highly modern lenses > and cameras so chances are these are more relevant plus its function is > more aesthetic than technical so