All said and done, Redshift is crazy-good though... Just saying.
...and how often are we rendering 100mio polys in commercials? In those
instances I'll split my scenes into layers and render them 50x faster (not
a joke) thank you very much.
DAN
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 2:41 AM, Raffaele
Redshift can handle that just fine. I know the term 'out-of-core' has
been tossed around a lot, but it bears repeating. When Redshift either
1) reaches its maximum geocache amount (which is currently capped at 4GB
for various reasons), or 2) reaches the ram limits of the card, it sends
data
What about the titan z series? Are they out yet? They could probably pack
quite a punch :)
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 9:35 AM, Stefan Kubicek s...@tidbit-images.comwrote:
I second that, the 780 with 6gb (~2300 cores vs ~2800 of the Titan) is
currently the biggest bang for the buck.
Make sure
Last time I checked they were more expensive than two separate titans.
What about the titan z series? Are they out yet? They could probably pack quite
a punch :)
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 9:35 AM, Stefan Kubicek s...@tidbit-images.com wrote:
I second that, the 780 with 6gb (~2300 cores vs
If you have two 6gb cards, does Redshift consider this as 12gb of RAM or
only 6gb?
On 20 May 2014 10:32, Stefan Kubicek s...@tidbit-images.com wrote:
Last time I checked they were more expensive than two separate titans.
What about the titan z series? Are they out yet? They could probably
no, vram only gets used by the card it's built in.
but 6 gb vram is quite a lot and can't be compared to cpu ram.
Means, if your scene uses like 15gb in Vray that doesn't mean 6gb is not
enough for the scene in Redshift.
Christian
On 20.05.2014 11:48, Cristobal Infante wrote:
If you have two
When you render on the CPU directly from your DCC app, you have your scene in
mem twice. Once in e.g. Soft, and once translated into what the renderer can
render, both are stored in RAM, hence the memory consumption appears relatively
high. In case of Redshift, video memory on the card (VRAM)
I wouldn't even say it's generally true.
The memory footprint of a scene to be rendered is hardly ever that directly
related to the footprint of the scene in the DCC client.
Acceleration structures paired with what global features you use alone can
reduce or multiply the footprint at any given
exactly!
i was actually saying, more specifically, that... Translated scene data is
usually a lot more efficient to store than the actual, raw scene...
(geometry) is what is generally true.
there are many other parts of the renderer that can consume memory and put
you way beyond the original
: softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com
[mailto:softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com] On Behalf Of Stefan Kubicek
Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2014 5:18 AM
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
Subject: Re: OT: Graphic card for optimous performance with Redshift
When you render on the CPU directly from your
sorry to nit pick but... in the hair case we don't deal with triangles
anymore. if you are using arnold, you are raytracing directly the curve.
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 5:48 PM, Matt Lind ml...@carbinestudios.com wrote:
With hair, the DCC will often display guide hairs as curves, or some
card for optimous performance with Redshift
sorry to nit pick but... in the hair case we don't deal with triangles anymore.
if you are using arnold, you are raytracing directly the curve.
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 5:48 PM, Matt Lind
ml...@carbinestudios.commailto:ml...@carbinestudios.com wrote
i think we are all too smart for this thread... :)
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 6:03 PM, Matt Lind ml...@carbinestudios.com wrote:
You still need to store the results at each sample on each hair.
Speak for yourself, I'm perfectly adequately stupid for any thread.
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 11:05 AM, Steven Caron car...@gmail.com wrote:
i think we are all too smart for this thread... :)
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 6:03 PM, Matt Lind ml...@carbinestudios.comwrote:
You still need to store
Hi, now that Redshift is officially out and running smoothly, I´d like to ask
you guys what
Graphic Cards for best GPU performance would be optimum for an I7 stream core?
I´m taking a look at:
EVGA EVGA GeForce GTX TITAN SuperClocked 6GB GDDR5 384bit, Dual-Link DVI-I,
DVI-D, HDMI,DP, SLI Ready
The Titans are fantastic, but I haven't seen one priced at $1000 in
several weeks. I would also skip the Quadro line altogether, as those
cards don't offer nearly as much bang for your buck (where Redshift is
concerned!) as the upper tiers of the GTX line.
If you can find a Titan at $1000, I
hey,
the titan black is very fast, but considering the benchmarks
(http://www.videocardbenchmark.net/high_end_gpus.html) the 780 isn't
lame either, and the 6gb version is close to half the price of a titan.
so if you want a bargain that's still fast, I would go for the 780 6gb.
Christian
On
17 matches
Mail list logo
