Re: Delete 2/3 particles - I forgot

2016-09-20 Thread Artur W
I feel so stupid. Artur 2016-09-20 15:42 GMT+02:00 Olivier Jeannel : > back to the modulo method modulo 3 gives you 0,1,2. > You don't have to compare =0 two times > You can set the compare to >= 1 it will eliminate value 1 & 2 and keep the > 0 (33%) > > On Tue, Sep 20,

Re: Delete 2/3 particles - I forgot

2016-09-20 Thread Artur W
Thanks. I was doing the modulo thing. Still confuses me a bit. Artur 2016-09-20 16:08 GMT+02:00 Artur W : > I feel so stupid. > > Artur > > 2016-09-20 15:42 GMT+02:00 Olivier Jeannel : > >> back to the modulo method modulo 3 gives you 0,1,2. >> You

Re: Delete 2/3 particles - I forgot

2016-09-20 Thread Olivier Jeannel
back to the modulo method modulo 3 gives you 0,1,2. You don't have to compare =0 two times You can set the compare to >= 1 it will eliminate value 1 & 2 and keep the 0 (33%) On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 3:21 PM, Tim Borgmann wrote: > Test random probabilty (set to 0,6, disable

Re: Delete 2/3 particles - I forgot

2016-09-20 Thread Tim Borgmann
Test random probabilty (set to 0,6, disable time varying). Tim Am 20/09/16 um 14:37 schrieb Artur W: Isn't the nth able to delete half at most? Artur 2016-09-20 14:02 GMT+02:00 Simon Reeves >: delete by nth, which is modulo

Re: Delete 2/3 particles - I forgot

2016-09-20 Thread Thomas Volkmann
You could also just take the "test random probablility" node. > patrick nethercoat hat am 20. September 2016 um > 14:44 geschrieben: > > if you do it twice, first delete 1/3, then 1/2 you'll end up right. > > > On 20 September 2016 at 13:37, Artur W

Re: Delete 2/3 particles - I forgot

2016-09-20 Thread Orlando Esponda
As Simon says, you can do it with modulo ​ tmp.jpg ​ On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 7:44 AM, patrick nethercoat < patr...@brandtanim.co.uk> wrote: > if you do it twice, first delete 1/3, then 1/2 you'll end up right. >

Re: Delete 2/3 particles - I forgot

2016-09-20 Thread patrick nethercoat
if you do it twice, first delete 1/3, then 1/2 you'll end up right. On 20 September 2016 at 13:37, Artur W wrote: > Isn't the nth able to delete half at most? > > Artur > > 2016-09-20 14:02 GMT+02:00 Simon Reeves : > >> delete by nth, which is

Re: Delete 2/3 particles - I forgot

2016-09-20 Thread Artur W
Isn't the nth able to delete half at most? Artur 2016-09-20 14:02 GMT+02:00 Simon Reeves : > delete by nth, which is modulo > > On Tue, 20 Sep 2016 at 12:46 Artur W wrote: > >> Hey, >> >> It's been a while. >> How can I delete in cache about 2/3 of

Re: Delete 2/3 particles - I forgot

2016-09-20 Thread Simon Reeves
delete by nth, which is modulo On Tue, 20 Sep 2016 at 12:46 Artur W wrote: > Hey, > > It's been a while. > How can I delete in cache about 2/3 of the particles? > > Artur > -- > Softimage Mailing List. > To unsubscribe, send a mail to