[Softwires] TR: I-D Action:draft-lee-6man-ra-dslite-00.txt

2010-09-28 Thread mohamed.boucadair
Dear all, FYI, we have submitted this new I-D. Comments, critiques, suggestions and questions are more than welcome. As mentioned in the draft, the provisioning of the AFTR is a very sensitive for the delivery of the IPv4 connectivity when DS-Lite is enabled. Any failure to provision such

Re: [Softwires] comments on draft-carpenter-softwire-sample-00

2010-09-28 Thread Mark Townsley
On 9/28/10 4:09 AM, Yiu L. Lee wrote: Hi Washam, Don't forget there are also Softwire Hub-and-Spoke (L2TPv2 based) and 6rd+. So far, we don't hear much response to support this work in the operator's community. I know of more than one L2TPv2 based softwire deployments active today. A new

Re: [Softwires] comments on draft-carpenter-softwire-sample-00

2010-09-28 Thread Mark Townsley
On 9/28/10 4:28 AM, Brian E Carpenter wrote: On 2010-09-28 15:09, Yiu L. Lee wrote: Hi Washam, Don't forget there are also Softwire Hub-and-Spoke (L2TPv2 based) and 6rd+. So far, we don't hear much response to support this work in the operator's community. One reason is that the smaller,

Re: [Softwires] comments on draft-carpenter-softwire-sample-00

2010-09-28 Thread WashamFan
Hi Remi, Personally, I think it is very meaningful to address tunneling IPv6 over IPv4 with NAT traversal issue, especially in China. We have less IPv4 address space assigned at the first place, compared to the huge population, the address per person ratio is very low, I suspect some ISPs have