A new version of draft-guo-softwire-6rd-radius-attrib-00.txt has been
successfully submitted. This
draft proposed Radius attribute for 6rd scenarios.
Your comments are welcome!
Regards,
Sheng, Dayong Remi
-Original Message-
From: IETF I-D Submission Tool
Hi, Alain David,
We'd like to have a time slot for a presentation in IETF 79.
1. Draft name: draft-guo-softwire-6rd-radius-attrib-00
2. Time requested: 5 mins
3. Presenter: Sheng Jiang
Best regards,
Sheng
-Original Message-
From: softwires-boun...@ietf.org
Hi, Alain and David,
I would like to have 10 min to present
tools.ietf.org/id/draft-despres-softwire-4rd-00.
In view of the support expressed by four ISPs in
www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/current/msg05247, the subject is important.
It would normally require much more than 10 min but,
Le 16 oct. 2010 à 04:15, Dong Zhang a écrit :
...
Is the A:W-N:Z mapping created staticly? Or dynimicly?
Dynamically when the 6a44-C starts operation.
It then remains static until the 6a44 client or the NAT is reset.
That is say it is similar to a kind of permanent state once the
On Oct 18, 2010, at 11:22 AM, Ted Lemon wrote:
On Oct 18, 2010, at 8:06 AM, mohamed.boucad...@orange-ftgroup.com
mohamed.boucad...@orange-ftgroup.com wrote:
In addition to the technical reasons mentioned in previous e-mails, I
I'm sorry, I must have missed that email. I saw a lot of
I believe Ted is saying the operator achieves its objectives because
when DHCP resolves the FQDN in order to distribute the address, it
invokes the DNS mappings that have been set up by the regional teams.
I see a potential gap in this reasoning. Could it be that the regional
teams manage
On Oct 19, 2010, at 4:48 AM, mohamed.boucad...@orange-ftgroup.com
mohamed.boucad...@orange-ftgroup.com wrote:
We believe that AFTR (CGN) capabilities should be distributed as close to
the customers as possible, not only for scalability, flexibility and
performance reasons, but also to
