[Softwires] ALG section in draft-ietf-softwire-dual-stack-lite-06

2011-02-23 Thread Dan Wing
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-softwire-dual-stack-lite-06 says: 8.3. Application Level Gateways (ALG) The AFTR should only perform a minimum number of ALG for the classic applications such as FTP, RTSP/RTP, IPsec and PPTP VPN pass-through and enable the users to use their own

[Softwires] DS-Lite I-D progress (was RE: dual-stack-lite-06 - Too biased against static port sharing)

2011-02-23 Thread mohamed.boucadair
Dear Alain, Yiu, Is there any plan to update the DS-Lite draft to take into account the comments received so far and to make this document progress? Cheers, Med -Message d'origine- De : francis.dup...@fdupont.fr [mailto:francis.dup...@fdupont.fr] Envoyé : mercredi 18 août 2010 21:48 À

Re: [Softwires] ALG section in draft-ietf-softwire-dual-stack-lite-06

2011-02-23 Thread Mark Townsley
I'd like to see all softwire documents be as silent as possible on specifics of NAT. The essential delta in ds-lite vs. a NAT44 CGN is that the tunnel is embedded within the NAT binding. I think the softwire documents should explain this, then point to behave for anything else that has to do

Re: [Softwires] ALG section in draft-ietf-softwire-dual-stack-lite-06

2011-02-23 Thread Lee, Yiu
Make sense. The authors will discuss this and send the response back to the working group. On 2/23/11 11:29 AM, Mark Townsley towns...@cisco.com wrote: I'd like to see all softwire documents be as silent as possible on specifics of NAT. The essential delta in ds-lite vs. a NAT44 CGN is that