Dear all,
We have submitted a draft regarding 4via6 stateless translation.
http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-murakami-softwire-4v6-translation-00.txt
comments are welcome.
A new version of I-D, draft-murakami-softwire-4v6-translation-00.txt
has been successfully submitted by Tetsuya Murakami and
reply
[Company_logo]Yu Fu
Phone: 010-82882578
Email: eleven.f...@huawei.com
Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.
Shangdi Xinxi Road 3#, Haidian District, Beijing 100085, P.R.China
inline: image001.jpg___
Softwires mailing
+1
Cheers,
Xiaohong.
open source PCP Client,
open source A+P
http://opensourcev6transtechnologies.weebly.com/
|
|+1
|
|Tetsuya Murakami wrote:
| +1
|
| On 2011/07/06, at 8:23, GangChen wrote:
|
| +1
|
|
| 2011/7/6, Lee, Yiuyiu_...@cable.comcast.com:
| +1
|
| On 7/6/11 10:33 AM, Rajiv Asati
The chairs of the Softwire WG would like to start a 2-week working
group last call on ³RADIUS Attribute for 6rd².
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-softwire-6rd-radius-attrib/
Please send substantive comments to the list and editorial comments
to the authors.
The wg last call ends on
Hi Paco,
Comments inline ..
On 7/7/11 3:39 AM, Paco Cortes pacosaddr...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi Jim,
can you clarify with the upper case part of your proposal?
o IPv4/IPv6-in-MPLS: SWID is the outer MPLS label. CONTEXT WITHIN swid
MAY BE INDICATED BY THE NEXT mpls LABEL IN THE STACK.
You
Following up on the 'stateless' thread from a wg chair perspective.
Yong and I are preparing a discussion FOR the Quebec meeting on the so-called
stateless solution.
There are a number of points in the current draft that need discussion.
For example, no logging has been presented as a strong
Yes, I agree that this change makes sense and provides more flexibility ..
thanks
On 7/7/11 9:48 AM, Paco Cortes pacosaddr...@googlemail.com wrote:
Thanks Jim, now I get it.
You were aiming at (outer label= SWID; inner label = CID), and I
misunderstood it as (outer label = SWID, inner label =
Hi Jim,
can you clarify with the upper case part of your proposal?
o IPv4/IPv6-in-MPLS: SWID is the outer MPLS label. CONTEXT WITHIN swid
MAY BE INDICATED BY THE NEXT mpls LABEL IN THE STACK.
You are speaking about a fully different case than the MPLS VPN case
currently in the draft, where
Thanks Jim, now I get it.
You were aiming at (outer label= SWID; inner label = CID), and I
misunderstood it as (outer label = SWID, inner label = something_new;
IP @ = CID).
Speaking about vanilla MPLS I was actually expecting (only label =
SWID; IP @ = CID)
It sounds sensible to me.
But do you
Hi Mark,
It seems that the chairs have some concerns on the a+p transition technology
which I understand.
However here in so-called stateless solution, a+p is used in a very specific
context, removing most of the concerns, at least to me.
Regards,
Behcet
Let's have discussion on the
Works for me (and thanks for the suggested text). If I don't hear
otherwise, I'll post an -05 version by tomorrow including Jim's
suggestions.
Thanks, Frank
-Original Message-
From: Jim Guichard [mailto:jguich...@juniper.net]
Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2011 6:54 AM
To: Paco Cortes
+1
Stateless protocols are easy to implement.
Thanks,
Tomoyuki
From: xiaohong.d...@orange-ftgroup.com
Date: Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 5:03 PM
Subject: Re: [Softwires] Next step for Stateless Motivations I-D
+1
Cheers,
Xiaohong.
open source PCP Client,
open source A+P
12 matches
Mail list logo
