Le 20 août 2011 à 06:15, Brian E Carpenter a écrit :
Ahah, you seem to assume that A+P will solve the ISP's shortage
of IPv4 addresses. That may be true for a year or three, but
after that they will discover that they have to CGN their A+P
customers, and then you have NAT444 after all, IMHO.
Le 20 août 2011 à 03:55, Mark Townsley a écrit :
On Aug 19, 2011, at 8:04 PM, Nejc Škoberne wrote:
Because of what RFC6333 says, suggesting NOW that solutions that don't need
NATs are variants of DS-lite is a sure way to confuse people.
Then we're already confused:
On Aug 20, 2011, at 3:20 AM, Rémi Després wrote:
Le 20 août 2011 à 03:55, Mark Townsley a écrit :
On Aug 19, 2011, at 8:04 PM, Nejc Škoberne wrote:
Because of what RFC6333 says, suggesting NOW that solutions that don't
need NATs are variants of DS-lite is a sure way to confuse
Washam,
Thank you for the detailed reaction.
More below.
Le 20 août 2011 à 10:44, Washam Fan a écrit :
Hi,
I support the seperation of address mapping from tunneled or
translated 4rd mechanisms.
Excellent.
I have some comments as below.
1. Is there any reason you changed 4rd BR to 4rd
Hi folks,
Following our rough concensus during Quebec City meeting and
according to our charter/milestones, the chairs would like to
ask the mailing list for the confirmation to adopt the following
drafts:
1. Deployment Considerations for Dual-Stack Lite
Le 20 août 2011 à 16:21, Yong Cui a écrit :
Hi folks,
Following our rough concensus during Quebec City meeting and
according to our charter/milestones, the chairs would like to
ask the mailing list for the confirmation to adopt the following
drafts:
...
5. Motivations for Stateless IPv4
2011/8/19 Brian E Carpenter brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com:
Ahah, you seem to assume that A+P will solve the ISP's shortage
of IPv4 addresses. That may be true for a year or three, but
after that they will discover that they have to CGN their A+P
customers, and then you have NAT444 after all,
Brian, Remi,
In line.
Best Regards,
Tina TSOU
http://tinatsou.weebly.com/contact.html
-Original Message-
From: softwires-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:softwires-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf
Of Brian E Carpenter
Sent: Saturday, August 20, 2011 3:54 PM
To: Rémi Després
Cc:
Le 21 août 2011 à 00:54, Brian E Carpenter a écrit :
On 2011-08-20 19:15, Rémi Després wrote:
...
- There is no claim AFAIK that the stateless solution fits all situations.
There is only a claim that some will use it alone if they can, because of
its simplicity, that some will combine it
Mark,
Interesting definition of retronym.
It remains, though, that an analogue clock, the example given in the given
reference) is a clock variant (a device for measuring time).
A 4rd-encapsulation solution is in no way a DS-lite variant (built on a tunnel
to reach a CGN).
It would be nice,
10 matches
Mail list logo
