2012/3/16 Rémi Després despres.r...@laposte.net
Maoke,
Let me try a more complete picture than before:
A1 -.
RFC6145-host| .-- 4rd BR --.
| ||
A2 -:--(v6net)--::--(v4 Internet)--- B
4rd-CE| |
Le 2012-03-19 à 09:16, Maoke a écrit :
2012/3/16 Rémi Després despres.r...@laposte.net
Maoke,
Let me try a more complete picture than before:
A1 -.
RFC6145-host| .-- 4rd BR --.
| ||
A2 -:--(v6net)--:
2012/3/19 Rémi Després despres.r...@laposte.net
Le 2012-03-19 à 09:16, Maoke a écrit :
2012/3/16 Rémi Després despres.r...@laposte.net
Maoke,
Let me try a more complete picture than before:
A1 -.
RFC6145-host| .-- 4rd BR --.
| ||
Le 2012-03-19 à 06:19, Maoke a écrit :
Remi,
please see inline.
2012/3/16 Rémi Després despres.r...@laposte.net
Maoke,
First:
- My apologies for having not answered this email before receiving a reminder
(it was by mistake lost in a stack of non-urgent things to do).
- Thanks
Le 2012-03-19 à 10:21, Maoke a écrit :
2012/3/19 Rémi Després despres.r...@laposte.net
Le 2012-03-19 à 09:16, Maoke a écrit :
2012/3/16 Rémi Després despres.r...@laposte.net
Maoke,
Let me try a more complete picture than before:
A1 -.
RFC6145-host|
2012/3/19 Rémi Després despres.r...@laposte.net
Le 2012-03-19 à 06:19, Maoke a écrit :
Remi,
please see inline.
2012/3/16 Rémi Després despres.r...@laposte.net
Maoke,
First:
- My apologies for having not answered this email before receiving a
reminder (it was by mistake lost in a
2012/3/19 Rémi Després despres.r...@laposte.net
Le 2012-03-19 à 10:21, Maoke a écrit :
2012/3/19 Rémi Després despres.r...@laposte.net
Le 2012-03-19 à 09:16, Maoke a écrit :
2012/3/16 Rémi Després despres.r...@laposte.net
Maoke,
Let me try a more complete picture than before:
Hi, Xing,
I look forward to face to face discussions in Paris if we don't clarify
everything before that (I will be busy on something else in the next 3 days).
Le 2012-03-18 à 23:39, Xing Li a écrit :
...
A key point is that 4rd doesn't prevent a 4rd-capable dual-stack CE node,
when it
Le 2012-03-19 à 11:38, Maoke a écrit :
...
let me draw an example for that:
A --- CE (IPv6 domain; router R1 here) BR (IPv4 Internet;
router R2 here)--- B
...
4rd-u isn't concerned with what happens between A and CE.
There, internal hosts have RFC1918 addresses and external
I am well aware of this, but this doesn't explain why 4rd mapping rules
similar
to those of CERNET2 wouldn't have, like MAP-T, IPv4 to IPv6 communication
(single translation) supported.
As said in RFC6219, CERNET hosts have their IPv6 addresses configured via
manual configuration or
2012/3/19 Rémi Després despres.r...@laposte.net
Le 2012-03-19 à 11:38, Maoke a écrit :
...
let me draw an example for that:
A --- CE (IPv6 domain; router R1 here) BR (IPv4 Internet;
router R2 here)--- B
...
4rd-u isn't concerned with what happens between A and CE.
There,
Hi, Rajiv,
Le 2012-03-19 à 15:16, Rajiv Asati (rajiva) a écrit :
I am well aware of this, but this doesn't explain why 4rd mapping rules
similar
to those of CERNET2 wouldn't have, like MAP-T, IPv4 to IPv6 communication
(single translation) supported.
As said in RFC6219, CERNET hosts
Le 2012-03-19 à 15:30, Maoke a écrit :
2012/3/19 Rémi Després despres.r...@laposte.net
Le 2012-03-19 à 11:38, Maoke a écrit :
...
let me draw an example for that:
A --- CE (IPv6 domain; router R1 here) BR (IPv4 Internet;
router R2 here)--- B
...
4rd-u isn't
2012/3/20 Rémi Després despres.r...@laposte.net
Le 2012-03-19 à 15:30, Maoke a écrit :
2012/3/19 Rémi Després despres.r...@laposte.net
Le 2012-03-19 à 11:38, Maoke a écrit :
...
let me draw an example for that:
A --- CE (IPv6 domain; router R1 here) BR (IPv4 Internet;
2012/3/20 Rémi Després despres.r...@laposte.net
Le 2012-03-19 à 15:30, Maoke a écrit :
2012/3/19 Rémi Després despres.r...@laposte.net
Le 2012-03-19 à 11:38, Maoke a écrit :
...
let me draw an example for that:
A --- CE (IPv6 domain; router R1 here) BR (IPv4 Internet;
Le 2012-03-19 à 16:08, Maoke a écrit :
2012/3/20 Rémi Després despres.r...@laposte.net
Le 2012-03-19 à 15:30, Maoke a écrit :
2012/3/19 Rémi Després despres.r...@laposte.net
Le 2012-03-19 à 11:38, Maoke a écrit :
...
let me draw an example for that:
A --- CE (IPv6
Dear wg,
After a number of discussions with my co-chair, our AD and various authors,
here is how we would like to move forward wrt 4rd.
1) There is an observation that all the solutions on the table E, T U
actually solve the stateless problem we started with.
There are differences, but
17 matches
Mail list logo