+1
Best Regards,
Leaf
-Original Message-
From: softwires-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:softwires-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf
Of Xing Li
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2012 10:33 AM
To: Suresh Krishnan
Cc: Softwires WG; Yong Cui
Subject: Re: [Softwires] Call for adoption of
Support.
--satoru
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 1:33 PM, Suresh Krishnan
suresh.krish...@ericsson.com wrote:
Hi all,
This call is being initiated to determine whether there is WG
consensus towards adoption of draft-mdt-softwire-map-dhcp-option-03 as a
softwire WG draft. Please state whether or not
Support it to be WG draft
Cheers
Yu
-
From: Suresh Krishnan
suresh.krish...@ericsson.commailto:suresh.krish...@ericsson.com
Date: Sat, Jul 7, 2012 at 5:18 AM
Subject: [Softwires] Call for adoption of draft-mdt-softwire-map-deployment-02
Hi Maoke,
On 20 July 2012 03:17, Maoke fib...@gmail.com wrote:
hi Woj,
let me truncate the old text that makes this message too long. focusing on
the recent replies.
2012/7/19 Wojciech Dec wdec.i...@gmail.com
Hello Maoke,
okay, if your MAP algorithm refers to the GMA, it is fine to
Support
On 6 July 2012 06:33, Suresh Krishnan suresh.krish...@ericsson.com wrote:
Hi all,
This call is being initiated to determine whether there is WG
consensus towards adoption of draft-mdt-softwire-map-dhcp-option-03 as a
softwire WG draft. Please state whether or not you're in favor of
Chairs: if draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-multicast is not to be
generalized, could a charter item be added for 6rd multicast?
draft-tsou-softwire-6rd-multicast seems to be a reasobale candidate.
Tom Taylor
___
Softwires mailing list
Softwires@ietf.org
Hi, Wojciech,
2012-07-20 12:56, Wojciech Dec:
Hi Maoke,
...
therefore i am objective of introducing PSID into the rule and making the
architecture stateless only in wording.
If you mean that by having PSID as part of the rule, moves MAP from being
stateless to stateful, then that's a
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 8:43 AM, Tom Taylor tom.taylor.s...@gmail.com wrote:
Chairs: if draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-multicast is not to be generalized,
could a charter item be added for 6rd multicast?
draft-tsou-softwire-6rd-multicast seems to be a reasobale candidate.
There is already a
Support.
Tina
On Jul 20, 2012, at 3:57 AM, Wojciech Dec
wdec.i...@gmail.commailto:wdec.i...@gmail.com wrote:
Support
On 6 July 2012 06:33, Suresh Krishnan
suresh.krish...@ericsson.commailto:suresh.krish...@ericsson.com wrote:
Hi all,
This call is being initiated to determine whether there
Support.
- Tetsuya
On 2012/07/05, at 21:33, Suresh Krishnan wrote:
Hi all,
This call is being initiated to determine whether there is WG
consensus towards adoption of draft-mdt-softwire-map-dhcp-option-03 as a
softwire WG draft. Please state whether or not you're in favor of the
adoption
A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
RFC 6674
Title: Gateway-Initiated Dual-Stack Lite Deployment
Author: F. Brockners, S. Gundavelli,
S. Speicher, D. Ward
Status: Standards Track
Remi,
On 20 July 2012 17:03, Rémi Després despres.r...@laposte.net wrote:
Hi, Wojciech,
2012-07-20 12:56, Wojciech Dec:
If the use of PSIDs in rules is useful, as it appears to be,
This is the point that needs to be explained.
The case is straightforward A+P.
For a single IPv4 address
Support.
Cheers,
Rajiv
-Original Message-
From: softwires-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:softwires-boun...@ietf.org] On
Behalf Of Satoru Matsushima
Sent: Friday, July 20, 2012 6:12 AM
To: Suresh Krishnan
Cc: Softwires WG; Yong Cui
Subject: Re: [Softwires] Call for adoption of
Support!
Regards,
-Shishio
(2012/07/06 13:33), Suresh Krishnan wrote:
Hi all,
This call is being initiated to determine whether there is WG
consensus towards adoption of draft-mdt-softwire-map-dhcp-option-03 as a
softwire WG draft. Please state whether or not you're in favor of the
14 matches
Mail list logo
