- Original Message -
From: "Black, David"
Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2019 2:45 PM
> > [Med] The intent of the draft is to reflect the current registered
tunnels types.
> ...
> > [Med] Registering new tunnel types is not in the scope set for this
draft.
>
> I understand that, but as stated
Re-,
I agree with you that many tunneling schemes are not present in the IANA
registry but is that a problem? I don't think so because registrations are for
a reason.
The natural way from where I sit is that any specification that, for example,
defines a specific YANG module for a tunneling
> [Med] The intent of the draft is to reflect the current registered tunnels
> types.
...
> [Med] Registering new tunnel types is not in the scope set for this draft.
I understand that, but as stated in the review, I don't think that it's the
best course of action. The email below appears to
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Softwires WG of the IETF.
Title : Tunnel Interface Types YANG Module
Authors : Mohamed Boucadair
Ian Farrer
