[Softwires] draft-ietf-softwire-map-radius

Hi all, Exchanging emails with Ian, regarding RFC8026 to be used to prioritize 464XLAT together with the other transition mechanisms, he suggested that we also consider draft-ietf-softwire-map-radius. So, my question is if it makes sense to the authors to make sure that either 464XLAT is

[Softwires] no need to update RFC8026 in draft-ietf-v6ops-transition-ipv4aas

Hi all, After a long chat with the authors of RFC8026, we have found an alternative solution which avoids updating RFC8026 and also avoids requiring a new option code for 464XLAT, as there is already one that we can use, which is related to NAT64, so still can use RFC8026 for our original

Re: [Softwires] [v6ops] updating RFC8026 with draft-ietf-v6ops-transition-ipv4aas

s the most convenient one. I'm fine either way. Thanks! Regards, Jordi -Mensaje original- De: v6ops en nombre de "Bernie Volz (volz)" Fecha: miércoles, 13 de junio de 2018, 23:02 Para: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ , "dh...@ietf.org" , "softwires@ietf.or

[Softwires] updating RFC8026 with draft-ietf-v6ops-transition-ipv4aas

Hi all, I'm sending this to Sotfwires and DHC WGs, in order to let know and seek review, but please keep the discussion only in v6ops which is responsible of this document https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-v6ops-transition-ipv4aas/ Here is the short summary of the reasons for

Re: [Softwires] Adoption call for draft-fsc-softwire-dhcp4o6-saddr-opt-07 - Respond by Mar 8th, 2017

+1 Saludos, Jordi -Mensaje original- De: Softwires en nombre de Tomek Mrugalski Responder a: Fecha: miércoles, 8 de marzo de 2017, 18:15 Para: Ian Farrer CC: Softwires-wg

Re: [Softwires] [dhcwg] Adoption call for draft-fsc-softwire-dhcp4o6-saddr-opt-07 - Respond by Mar 8th, 2017

was surprised to read that this document, if approved, will update RFC7568. RFC7568 is about SSL 3.0. So, my guess is that you meant to update RFC7598? Just so the authors can update the XML to avoid this error to go on ... Regards, Jordi -Mensaje original- De: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ

Re: [Softwires] [dhcwg] Adoption call for draft-fsc-softwire-dhcp4o6-saddr-opt-07 - Respond by Mar 8th, 2017

+1 Saludos, Jordi -Mensaje original- De: Softwires en nombre de tianxiang li Responder a: Fecha: martes, 28 de febrero de 2017, 14:24 Para: Tomek Mrugalski CC: Softwires-wg

[Softwires] Tunnel discovery

Hi, Looking at the need for discovering a tunnel-endpoint for DSLINE, same as for other softwires protocols, I wonder if we should revive the work previously done at http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-palet-v6ops-tun-auto-disc-03.txt I see that a DHCP option is being proposed, however, our previous