-motivation-04
Motivations for Carrier-side Stateless IPv4 over IPv6
Migration Solutions
Reviewer: Joel M. Halpern
Review Date: 5-Oct-2012
IETF LC End Date: 17-Oct-2012
IESG Telechat date: 25-Oct-2012
Summary: This document is nearly ready for publication as an
Informational RFC.
Major
On 10/5/2012 11:38 AM, mohamed.boucad...@orange.com wrote:
Dear Joel,
Thank you for the review.
Please see inline.
Cheers,
Med
-Message d'origine-
De : softwires-boun...@ietf.org
[mailto:softwires-boun...@ietf.org] De la part de Joel M. Halpern
Envoyé : vendredi 5 octobre 2012 17:15
À
In the IETF, a document being adopted by a working group does not
generally imply that other related documents are adopted. There may be
many reasons why the WG does not (or does) wish to do so.
Each docoument is adopted when the chgairs, after consulting the working
group, determine that it
This appears to mix different kinds of state.
In particular, with regard to state in network resident boxes, there can be:
General state covering all subscribers;
Per subscriber state provisioned state;
Per subscriber dynamic, but not flow specific state;
per flow state.
All are state.
The first
, and
worked on, we need folks to step forward as reviewers. Folks who are
not the authors.
Yours,
Joel M. Halpern
An observer without a preference on outcomes.
PS: I think there is also some confusion about IETF processes. However,
I will not belabor the list with a rant on that. I will happily answer
