Re: [Softwires] [Int-area] Errata on RFC 6333, "Dual-Stack Lite Broadband Deployments Following IPv4 Exhaustion"

: "mohamed.boucad...@orange.com" Date: Tuesday, 11 May 2021 at 08:49 To: "ianfar...@gmx.com" , Eric Vyncke Cc: "softwires@ietf.org" , "int-a...@ietf.org" Subject: RE: [Int-area] [Softwires] Errata on RFC 6333, "Dual-Stack Lite Broadband Deployments Followin

Re: [Softwires] [Int-area] Errata on RFC 6333, "Dual-Stack Lite Broadband Deployments Following IPv4 Exhaustion"

ires] Errata on RFC 6333, "Dual-Stack Lite Broadband Deployments Following IPv4 Exhaustion" Hi Éric, My reading of the current RFC6333 text is that it is trying to highlight the importance of not fragmenting the IPv4 packet before encapsulation as this will break things. This,

Re: [Softwires] [Int-area] Errata on RFC 6333, "Dual-Stack Lite Broadband Deployments Following IPv4 Exhaustion"

Hi, all, Draft-ietf-intarea-tunnels describes the flaws in RFC 2473: o IPv6 tunnels [RFC2473 ] -- IPv6 or IPv4 in IPv6 * o Treats tunnel MTU as tunnel path MTU, not tunnel egress MTU o Decrements transiting packet hopcount (by 1)